Genetic structure of a Japanese brown frog (Rana japonica) population implies severe restriction of gene flow caused by recent urbanization in a satoyama landscape

References

• Andersen LW, Fog K, Damgaard C. 2004. Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 271:1293–1302.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson CD, Epperson BK, Fortin MJ, Holderegger R, James PMA, Rosenberg MS, Scribner KT, Spear S. 2010. Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow. Mol Ecol. 19:3565–3575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuma A, Takeuchi K. 1999. Relationships between population density of frogs and environmental conditions in Yatsu-habitat.. J Jpn Inst Landscape Architec. 62:573–576 (in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Beebee TJC. 2005. Conservation genetics of amphibians. Heredity. 95:423–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology?. Biol Conserv. 125:271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 9:1657–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman SA. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biol Conserv. 128:231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Amato. 2004. The expansion of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Gen. 5:702–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixo M, Metzger JP, Morgante JS, Zamudio KR. 2009. Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest. Biol Conserv. 142:1560–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, CK Jr., Smith LL. 2003. Habitat destruction and alteration. Historical trends and future prospects for amphibians. In: Amphibian Conservation, p. 94–112. Semlitsch, R.D., Ed., Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L. 2002. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol. 11:2571–2581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 10:564–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 131:479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA.. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Shriver WG. 2005. Can road mortality limit populations of pool-breeding amphibians?. Wetl Ecol Manag. 13:281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Whiteleather KK, Schueler FW. 2005. Changes in frog and toad populations over 30 years in New York State. Ecol Appl. 15:1148–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzy JC, McCoy ED, Deyle AC, Gonzalez SM, Halstead N, Mushinsky HR. 2012. Urbanization interferes with the use of amphibians as indicators of ecological integrity of wetlands.. J. App Ecol,. 49:941–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ. 2008. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biol Conserv. 141:2432–2449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara Y, Takeuchi K, Okubo S. 2005. Urbanization linked with past agricultural landuse patterns in the urban fringe of a deltaic Asian mega-city: A case study in Bangkok. Landscape Urban Plan. 73:16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He JF, Liu JY, Zhuang DF, Zhang W, Liu ML. 2007. Assessing the effect of land use/land cover change on the change of urban heat island intensity. Theor Appl Climatol. 90:217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment, www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed February 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kobori H, Primack RB. 2003. Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. Ambio. 32:307–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy RC.. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv Biol. 1 2: 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lane SJ, Fujioka M. 1998. The impact of changes in irrigation practices on the distribution of foraging egrets and herons (Ardeidae) in the rice fields of central Jpn. Biol Conserv. 83:221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Leal IR, Filgueiras BKC, Gomes JP, Iannuzzi L, Andersen AN. 2012. Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodivers Conserv. 21:1687–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Liu M, Zhuang D, Zhang Z, Deng X.. 2003. Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995-2000. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences. 46 (4): 373–384.
   Google Scholar
• Manni F, Guérard E, Heyer E. 2004. Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: How barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm. Hum Biol. 76:173–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marunouchi J, Kusano T, Ueda H. 2002. Fluctuation in abundance and age structure of a breeding population of the Japanese brown frog, Rana japonica Günther (Amphibia, Anura). Zool Sci. 19:343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël S, Ouellet M, Galois P, Lapointe FJ. 2007. Impact of urban fragmentation on the genetic structure of the eastern red-backed salamander. Conserv Gen. 8:599–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osawa S, Katsuno T. 2001. Dispersal of the Brown Frogs, Rana japonica and R. ornativentris in the forest of the Tama Hills. Curr Herpetol. 20:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Lindenmayer D.. 2006. Genetic insights into population recovery following experimental perturbation in a fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv. 132:520–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellet J, Guisan A, Perrin N. 2004. A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol. 18:1599–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safner T, Miaud C, Gaggiotti O, Decout S, Rioux D, Zundel S, Manel S. 2011. Combining demography and genetic analysis to assess the population structure of an amphibian in a human-dominated landscape. Conserv Gen. 12:161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Saizen I, Mizuno K, Kobayashi S. 2006. Effects of land-use master plans in the metropolitan fringe of Japan. Landscape Urban Plan. 78:411–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 306:1783–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CFA. 1992. cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics. 132:619–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji M, Ushimaru A, Osawa T, Mitsuhashi H. 2011. Paddy-associated frog declines via urbanization: A test of the dispersal-dependent-decline hypothesis. Landscape Urban Plan. 103:318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Yokohari M, Bolthouse J. 2011. Keep it alive, don't freeze it: A conceptual perspective on the conservation of continuously evolving satoyama landscapes. Landsc Ecol Eng. 7:207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon CG. 2009. Wise use of paddy rice fields to partially compensate for the loss of natural wetlands. Paddy Water Environ. 7:357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar