Species identification and genetic differentiation of European cavity-nesting wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Pompilidae, Crabronidae) inferred from DNA barcoding data

References

• Ács Z, Challis RJ, Bihari P, Blaxter M, Hayward A, Melika G, Csóka G, et al. (2010). Phylogeny and DNA barcoding of inquiline oak gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) of the Western Palaearctic. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55:210–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antropov AV. (2001). Tribu des Trypoxylini. In: Bitsch J, editor. Faune de France 86. Hyménoptères Sphecidae d'Europe Occidentale. Volume 3. Paris: Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles. p 347–84
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann T, Hadrys H, Breves G, Schierwater B. (2009). Character-based DNA barcoding: A superior tool for species classification. Berl Munch Tierarztl 122:446–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsch J, Leclercq J. (1993). Faune de France 79. Hyménoptères Sphecidae d'Europe Occidentale. Volume 1. Généralités – Crabroninae. Paris, France: Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles
   Google Scholar
• Budrys E, Andreu Ureta J, Briliūtė A, Cetkovic A, Heinrich S, Kroel-Dulay G, Moora M, et al. (2010). Cavity-nesting Hymenoptera across Europe: A study in ALARM project field site network sites using small trap-nests on trees and buildings. In: Settele J, Penev L, Georgiev T, Grabaum R, Grobelnik V, Hammen V, et al., editors. Atlas of Biodiversity Risk. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers. p 172–4
   Google Scholar
• Day MC. (1988). Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Handbooks for the identification of British insects, 6, Part 4. London, the United Kingdom: Royal Entomological Society
   Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M. (2005). The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phylos T Roy Soc B 360:1905–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebeling A, Klein A-M, Weisser W, Tscharntke T. (2012). Multitrophic effects of experimental changes in plant diversity on cavity-nesting bees, wasps, and their parasitoids. Oecologia 169:453–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. (1989). PHYLIP-Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–6
   Google Scholar
• Fu YX, Li WH. (1993). Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathmann A, Greiler H-J, Tscharntke T. (1994). Trap-nesting bees and wasps colonizing set–aside fields: Succession and body size, management by cutting and sowing. Oecologia 98:8–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathmann A, Tscharntke T. (1999). Landschafts-Bewertung mit Bienen und Wespen in Nisthilfen: Artenspektrum, Interaktionen und Bestimmungsschlüssel. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Baden-Württemberg 73:277–305
   Google Scholar
• Gayubo SF, Gonzalez JA, Asis JD, Tormos J. (2005). Conservation of European environments: The Spheciformes wasps as biodiversity indicators (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Ampulicidae, Sphecidae and Crabronidae). J Nat Hist 39:2705–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R. (2011). Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: Determination, discovery, and description. Bioessays 33:135–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. (2006). DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 103:968–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Sym Ser 41:95–8
   Google Scholar
• Hammen VC, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Budrys E, Christensen TR, Fronzek S, Grabaum R, et al. (2010). Establishment of a cross-European field site network in the ALARM project for assessing large-scale changes in biodiversity. Environ Monit Assess 164:337–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings JM, Schultheis PJ, Whitson M, Holliday CW, Coelho JR, Mendell AM. (2008). DNA barcoding of new world cicada killers (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Zootaxa 1713:27–38
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. (2003a). Biological identification through DNA barcodes. P Roy Soc B 270:313–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ranasingham S, deWaard JR. (2003b). Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. P Roy Soc B 270:96–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. (2004). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 41:4812–17
   Google Scholar
• Holt EA, Miller SW. (2011). Bioindicators: Using organisms to measure environmental impacts. Nature Education Knowledge 3:8
   Google Scholar
• Jun D, Yu F, Zhang T-X, Hu H-Y, Zhu C-D, Wu S-A, Zhang Y-Z. (2012). DNA barcoding of six Ceroplastes species (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae) from China. Mol Ecol Res 12:791–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenpoth M, Showers Cornelli P, Dunn DM, Weiss RB, Strohm E, Seger J. (2012). Accelerated evolution of mitochondrial but not nuclear genomes of Hymenoptera: New evidence from crabronid wasps. PLoS One 7:e32826
   Google Scholar
• Kaartinen R, Stone GN, Hearn J, Lohse K, Roslin T. (2010). Revealing secret liaisons: DNA barcoding changes our understanding of food webs. Ecol Entom 35:623–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A-M, Steffan-Dewenter I, Buchori D, Tscharntke T. (2002). Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1003–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A-M, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. (2004). Foraging trip duration and density of megachilid bees, eumenid wasps and pompilid wasps in tropical agroforestry systems. J Anim Ecol 73:517–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librado P, Rozas J. (2009). DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison WP, MAdison DR. (2011). Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org (Accessed February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Magnacca KN, Brown MJF. (2010a). Mitochondrial heteroplasmy and DNA barcoding in Hawaiian Hylaeus (Nesoprosopis) bees (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). BMC Evol Biol 10:174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnacca KN, Brown MJF. (2010b). Tissue segregation of mitochondrial haplotypes in heterolasmic Hawaiian Hylaeus bees: Implications for DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Res 10:60–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnacca KN, Brown MJF. (2012). DNA barcoding a regional fauna: Irish solitary bees. Mol Ecol Res 12:990–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier R, Zhang G, Ali F. (2008). The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the “barcoding gap” and leads to misidentification. Syst Biol 57:809–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen A, Hulden L. (1991). Distribution and phenology of the Ancistrocerus and Symmorphus species in Eastern Fennoscandia (Hymenoptera, Eumenidae). Entomol Fennica 2:179–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quicke DLJ, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Fernandez-Triana J, Laurenne NM, Zaldívar-Riverón A, et al. (2012). Utility of the DNA barcoding gene fragment for parasitic wasp phylogeny (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea): Data release and new measure of taxonomic congruence. Mol Ecol Res 12:676–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. (2008). Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. P Roy Soc Lond B 275:237–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach MJ, Astrin JJ, Hannig K, Peters MK, Stoeckle MY, Waegele J-W. (2010). Molecular species identification of Central European ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) using nuclear rDNA expansion segments and DNA barcodes. Front Zool 7:26. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid BN, Le M, McCord WP, Iverson JB, Georges A, Bergmann T, Amato G, et al. eSalle R, Naro-Maciel E. (2011). Comparing and combining distance-based and character-based approaches for barcoding turtles. Mol Ecol Res 11:956–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera J, Currie DC. (2009). Identification of Nearctic black flies using DNA barcodes (Diptera: Simuliidae). Mol Ecol Res 9:224–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar IN, Thornton J, Planet PJ, Schierwater B, DeSalle R. (2002). A systematic method for classification of novel homeoboxes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 24:388–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar IN, Planet PJ, DeSalle R. (2008). CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Res 8:1256–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Egger C. (1994). Bestimmungsschlüssel für die deutschen Arten der solitären Faltenwespen (Hymenoptera: Eumeninae). In: Mauss V, Treiber R, editors. Bestimmungsschlüssel für die Faltenwespen (Hymenoptera: Masarinae, Polistinae, Vespinae) der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Hamburg: Deutscher Jugendbund für Naturbeobachtung. p 54–90
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield CS, Hebert PDN, Kevan PG, Parker L. (2009). DNA barcoding a regional bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) fauna and its potential for ecological studies. Mol Ecol Res 9:196–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Fisher BL, Hebert PDN. (2005). DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: The ants of Madagascar. Phylos T Roy Soc B 360:1825–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Deans AR, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. (2008). Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology and collections. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 105:12359–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalhut JK, Fernández-Triana J, Adamowicz SJ, Buck M, Goulet H, Hebert PDN, Huber JT, et al. (2013). DNA barcoding reveals diversity of Hymenoptera and the dominance of parasitoids in a sub-arctic environment. BMC Ecol 13:2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffan-Dewenter I. (2002). Landscape context affects trap-nesting bees, wasps and their natural enemies. Ecol Entomol 27:631–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tailor HR, Harris WE. (2012). An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: A review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Res 12:377–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T, Lewis OT. (2007). Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs. Nature 445:202–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I. (1998). Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: Community structure and interactions. J App Ecol 35:708–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turčinavičienė J, Rakauskas R. (2009). Macrosiphum on Knautia in Central Europe – Molecular data support the synonymy of M. silvaticum and M. knautiae (Hemiptera Aphididae). Redia 42:105–16
   Google Scholar
• Veddeler D, Tylianakis J, Tscharntke T, Klein A-M. (2010). Natural enemy diversity reduces temporal variability in wasp but not bee parasitism. Oecologia 162:755–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira LC, Oliveira NG, Gayubo SF. (2011). On the use of Apiformes and Spheciformes (Insecta: Hymenoptera) populations as a management tool. Biodivers Conserv 20:519–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar