DNA barcoding using skin exuviates can improve identification and biodiversity studies of snakes

References

• Akbarsha MA. (2007). Movement to curtail animal dissections in Zoology curriculum: Review of the Indian experience. ALTEX 24:163–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardura A, Linde AR, Moreira JC, Garcia-Vasquez E. (2010). DNA barcoding for conservation and management of Amazonian commercial fish. Biol Conserv 143:1438–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CS, Palumbi SR. (1994). Which wales are hunted? A molecular genetic approach to monitoring whaling. Science 265:1538–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett RDH, Hebert PDN. (2005). Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool 83:481–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth E. (1854). Notices and descriptions of various reptiles, new or little known (part 2). J Asiatic Soc Bengal, Calcutta 23:287–302
   Google Scholar
• Boulenger GA. (1890). The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Batrachia. London: Taylor & Francis, xviii
   Google Scholar
• Burbrink FT, Crother BI. (2011). Evolution and taxonomy of snakes. In: Aldridge RA, Sever DM, editors. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of snakes. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. p 19–53
   Google Scholar
• Clarke SC, Magnussen JE, Abercrombie DL, McAllister MK, Shivji MS. (2006). Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market based on molecular genetics and trade records. Conserv Biol 20:201–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox CL, Davis Rabosky AR. (2013). Data from: Spatial and temporal drivers of phenotypic diversity in polymorphic snakes. American Naturalist, Dryad Digital Repository. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.876dn (Accessed 10 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dubey B, Meganathan PR, Haque I. (2009). Multiplex PCR assay for rapid identification of three endangered snake species of India. Conserv Genet 10:1861–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey B, Meganathan PR, Haque I. (2011). DNA mini-barcoding: An approach for forensic identification of some endangered Indian snake species. Forensic Sci Int 5:181–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton MJ, Meyers GL, Kolokotronis S-O, LeslieMS, Martin AP, Amato G. (2010). Barcoding bushmeat: molecular identification of Central African and South American harvested vertebrates. Conserv Genet 11:1389–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eguchi T, Yukinori E. (2000). High yield DNA extraction from the snake cast-off skin or bird feathers using collagenase. Biotechnol Lett 22:1097–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid AM, Parvin S. (2001). The first record of Ptyas korros (Colubridae) from Bangladesh. A Her Res 9:23–4
   Google Scholar
• Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E. (2007). A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:530–42
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LA. (1989). An evaluation of stomach flushing techniques for crocodilians. J Herpetol 23:170–2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong JJ, Parham JF, Shi HBL, Stuart RL. (2007). Carter A genetic survey of heavily exploited, endangered turtles: Caveats on the conservation value of trade animals. Anim Conserv 10:452–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis CM, Borisenk AV, Ivanova NV, Eger JL, Lim BK, Guillen-Servent A, Kruskop SV, et al. (2010). The role of DNA barcode in understanding and conservation of mammal diversity in southeast Asia. PLoS One 5:e12575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould SJ, Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ, Schopf TJM, Simberloff DS. (1977). The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology 3:23–40
   Google Scholar
• Gower DJ, Winkler JD. (2007). Taxonomy of the Indian snake Xylophis beddome (Serpentes: caenophidia), with description of a new species. Hamadryad 31:315–29
   Google Scholar
• Guha S, Kashyap VK. (2005). Development of novel heminested PCR assays based on mitochondrial 16Sr RNA gene for identification of seven Pecora species. Genet BMC 6:42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. (2006). DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:968–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–8
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc, Lond Biol 270:313–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. (2004a). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14812–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. (2004b). Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2:e312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickerson MJ, Dolman G, Moritz C. (2006). Comparative phylogeographic summary statistics for testing simultaneous vicariance across taxon-pairs. Mol Ecol 15:209–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. (2007). Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7:554–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerome M, Lemaire C, Verrez-Bagnis V, Etienne M. (2003). Direct sequencing method for species identification of canned sardine and sardine type products. Agric J Food Chem 51:7326–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnaeus C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Homiae: Laurentii Salvii
   Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. (2005). DNA Barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol 3:e422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen NT, Schander C, Willassen E. (2007). Local scale DNA barcoding of bivalves (Mollusca): A case study. Zool Scr 36:455–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray JA. (1884). Additions to the reptilian fauna of Sind. Ann Mag nat Hist 14:106–11
   Google Scholar
• Nagy ZT, Sonet G, Glaw F, Vences M. (2012). First large-scale DNA Barcoding assessment of reptiles in the biodiversity hotspot of madagascar, based on newly designed coi primers. PLoS One 7:e34506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee S, May RM, Harvey PH. (1994). The reconstructed evolutionary process. Phil Trans R Soci Lond B 344:305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntie S, Johnston AR, Mickala P, Bowkett AE, Van Vuuren BJ, Colyn M, Telfer P, et al. (2010). A molecular diagnostic for identifying Central African forest artiodactyls from faecal pellets. Anim Conserv 13:80–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendini L. (2005). Comment on “Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes”. Can J Zool 83:498–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell M, Huber H, Park L. (2004). Molecular methods for genetic identification of Salmonid prey from Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi) scat. Fish Bull 102:213–20
   Google Scholar
• Rosse C. (1995). The potential of computerized representations of anatomy in the training of health care providers. Acad Med 70:499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyanarayana MC. (2013). Need for alternatives for animals in education and the alternative resources. Proc ALTEX 2:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Sathyanarayana, MC. (2009). The implications and benefits of teaching humane science. Seminar on ahimsa and animal alternatives. Vivekananda College, Chennai, India. p 13. (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Schlegel H. (1837). Abbildungen neuer oder unvollständig bekannter Amphibien, nach der Natur oder dem Leben entworfen, herausgegeben und mit einem erläuternden Texte begleitet. Part 1. Düsseldorf: Arnz & Co
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, RC. (2003). Handbook Indian snakes. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata (Xx, pp 292, 69 plates)
   Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. (2006). DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3657–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hanni C. (2005). Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 23:359–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP. (2009). Herpetology. Burlington, MA: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, PDN. Hebert. (2005). DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1847–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welton LJ, Cameron D Siler, Charles WL, Arvin C Diesmos, Mae L. Diesmos, Emerson Sy, Rafe M Brown. (2012). Dragons in our midst: Phyloforensics of illegally traded Southeast Asian monitor lizards. Biol Conser 159:7–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KL, Wang J, But PP, Shaw PC. (2003). Application of cytochrome b DNA sequences for the authentication of endangered snake species. Forensic Sci Int 139:49–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar