Impact of prostate size on urinary quality of life scores after open radical prostatectomy: A single-center experience

References

• Ohno Y, Nakamura T, Murata K. Cancer statistics 2004. In Oshima A, Kuroishi T, Tajima K, editors. Tokyo: Shinohara shuppan; 2004. p 202–17; In Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Stattin P, Holmberg E, Johansson JE, Holmberg L, Adolfsson J, Hugosson J. National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden. National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden: outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:950–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Namiki S, Ishidoya S, Kawamura S, Tochigi T, Arai Y. Quality of life among elderly men treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010;136:379–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP, Babaian RJ, Chesley A, Kane RA, Littrup PJ, et al. Observations on the early detection of prostate cancer from the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer 1997;80:1814–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JW, Kuban DA, Lynch DF, Schellhammer PF. Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality. J Urol 2001;166:947–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Namiki S, Numahata K, Satoh M, Ishidoya S, Ito A, et al. Impact of unilateral interposition sural nerve graft on the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: a preliminary study. Int J Urol 2007;14:133–9.
   Google Scholar
• D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A. A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 1998;52:631–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:601–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley CL, Bott SR, Thomas K, Parkinson MC, Kirby RS. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU Int 2003;92:370–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Fagin R, Shah G, Shekarriz B. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;173:552–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boczko J, Erturk E, Golijanin D, Madeb R, Patel H, Joseph JV. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21:184–8.
   Google Scholar
• Konety BR, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR. CaPSURE Investigators. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume – analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database. J Urol 2007;177:1423–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson AW, Bagga HS, Pavlovich CP, Mettee LZ, Ward NT, Link RE, et al. The impact of prostate size on urinary quality of life indexes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2008;179:1818–22.
   Google Scholar
• Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, Kumamoto Y, Miyake H, Rhodes T, Girman CJ, et al. Japanese men have smaller prostate volumes but comparable urinary flow rates relative to American men: results of community based studies in 2 countries. J Urol 1996;155:1324–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakehi Y, Takegami M, Suzukamo Y, Namiki S, Arai Y, Kamoto T, et al. Health related quality of life in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer treated with current multiple modalities assessed by a newly developed Japanese version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. J Urol 2007;177:1856–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PC. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan AD, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell's urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2002. p 3107–29.
   Google Scholar
• Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, Guess HA, Girman CJ, Panser LA, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA 1993;270:860–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Montie JE, Litwin MS, et al. Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:557–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DC, Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Pimentel H, Sandler HM, et al. Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2772–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen RC, Clark JA, Talcott JA. Individualizing quality-of-life outcomes reporting: how localized prostate cancer treatments affect patients with different levels of baseline urinary, bowel, and sexual function. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3916–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo Y, Guedea F, Aguiló F, Fernández P, Macías V, Mariño A, et al. Quality-of-life impact of primary treatments for localized prostate cancer in patients without hormonal treatment. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4687–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namiki S, Saito S, Ishidoya S, Tochigi T, Ioritani N, Yoshimura K, et al. Adverse effect of radical prostatectomy on nocturia and voiding frequency symptoms. Urology 2005;66:147–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birder LA, de Groat WC. Mechanisms of disease: involvement of the urothelium in bladder dysfunction. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2007;4:46–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Ikeda Y, Namiki S, Numahata K, Satoh M, et al. Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;173:1139–42.
   Google Scholar
• Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A, Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, et al. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery. BJU Int 2013;111:717–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassouf W, Nakanishi H, Ochiai A, Babaian KN, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies. J Urol 2007;178:111–14.
   Google Scholar