Bioadhesive polymers: Novel tool for drug delivery

References

• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. 2009. Mucoadhesive polymeric platform for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 71:505–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya RKK, Juyal V, Singh R. 2010a. Development and evaluation of gastroresistant microspheres of pantoprazole. Int J Pharmacy Pharma Sci. 2:112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Arya RKK, Singh R, Juyal V. 2010b. Mucoadhesive microspheres of famotidine: preparation characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int J Eng Sci Tech. 2:1575–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Asane GS, Nirmal SA, Rasal KB, Naik AA, Mahadik MS, Rao YM. 2008. Polymers for mucoadhesive drug delivery system: a current status. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 34:1246–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri KS, Taghizadeh SM, Mirzadeh H. 2009. An investigation on the short-term biodegradability of chitosan with various molecular weights and degrees of deacetylation. Carbohyd Polym. 78:773–778.
   Google Scholar
• Barry BW, Meyer MC. 1979. The rheological properties of carbopol gels I. Continuous shear and creep properties of carbopol gels. Int J Pharm. 2:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bazigha K, Abdul RS. 2010. In vitro evaluation of miconazole mucoadhesive buccal films. Int J Appl Pharm. 2:23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bhalodia R, Biswajit B, Garala K, Bhavik J, Mehta K. 2010. Buccoadhesive drug delivery systems. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 1:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bhanja S, Ellaiah P, Kumar S, Sahu PK, Tiwari SP, Panigrahi BB, Das D. 2010. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Timolol maleate. Int J Pharm Biomed. 1:129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bilensoy E, Sen M, Dogan AL, Calis S. 2007. Thermosensitive mucoadhesive gel formulation loaded with 5-Fu: cyclodextrin complex for HPV-induced cervical cancer. J Inclusion Phenom Macrocyclic Chem. 57:363–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZNK, Nath RA, Banji D. 2010. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 1:381–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogataj M, Mrhar A, Korosec L. 1999. Influence of physicochemical and biological parameters on drug release from microspheres adhered on vesical and intestinal mucosa. Int J Pharm. 177:211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Capra RH, Baruzzi AM, Quinzani LM. 2007. Rheological, dielectric and diffusion analysis of mucin/carbopol matrices used in amperometric biosensors. Sensor Actuat B: Chem. 124:466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreno-Gomez B, Woodley JF, Florence AT. 1999. Studies on the uptake of tomato lectin nanoparticles in everted gut sacs. Int J Pharm. 183:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, Verma N. 2012. Preparation of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of metoprolol succinate: in vitro and in vivo drug release and bioadhesion. Trop J Pharma Res. 11:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Langer, R. 1998. Oral particulate delivery: status and future trends. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 34:339–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenite A, Chaput C, Wang D, Combes C, Buschmann MD, Hoemann CD, et al. 2000. Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ, Biomaterials. 21:2155–2161.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdary CPR, Rao YS. 2004. Mucoadhesive microspheres for controlled drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull. 27:1717–1724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdary KPR, Srinivas L. 2000. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems: a review of current status. Ind Drug. 37:400–406.
   Google Scholar
• Choy YB, Park JH, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. 2008. Mucoadhesive microdiscs engineered for ophthalmic drug delivery: effect of particle geometry and formulation on preocular residence time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 49:4808–4815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies NM, Farr SJ, Hadgraft J, Kellaway IW. 1992. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. II. Polymer-coated vesicles. Pharm Res. 9:1137–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia M, Thakkar V, Patel N, Gandhi T. 2012. Development and characterisation of thermo reversible mucoadhesive moxifloxacin hydrochloride in situ ophthalmic gel. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 4: 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dubolazov AV, Nurkeeva ZS, Mun GA, Khutoryanskiy VV. 2006. Design of mucoadhesive polymeric films based on blends of poly(acrylic acid) and (hydroxypropyl)cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 7: 1637–1643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot JH, Ganz AJ. 1974. Some rheological properties of sodium carboxymethylcellulose solutions and gels. Rheologica Acta. 13: 670–674.
   Google Scholar
• Eouani C, Piccerelle P, Prinderre P, Bourret E, Joachim J. 2011. In-vitro comparative study of buccal mucoadhesive performance of different polymeric films. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 52:45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fini A, Bergamante V, Ceschel GC. 2011. Mucoadhesive gels designed for the controlled release of chlorhexidine in the oral cavity. Pharmaceutics. 3:665–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Good RJ. 1992. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 6:1269–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SH. 1988. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 5:21–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haltner EJH, Lehr CM. 1997. Lectins and bacterial invasion factors for controlling endo and transcytosis of bioadhesive drug carrier system. Euro J Pharm Biopharm. 44:3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstedt P, Danielsson A, Nyhlin H, Stenling R, Suhr O. 1989. Adhesion of bacteria to the human small-intestinal mucosa. A scanning electron microscopic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 24:877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui HW, Robinson JR. 1985. Ocular delivery of progesterone using a bioadhesive polymer. Int J Pharm. 26:203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imam ME, Hornof M, Alenta V, Reznicek G, Schnürch AB. 2003. Evidence for the interpenetration of mucoadhesive polymers into the mucous gel layer. STP Pharma Sci. 13:171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Jasti B, Li X, Cleary G. 2003. Recent Advances in mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Pharm Tech. 1:194–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kesavan K, Nath G, Pandit JK. 2010. Sodium alginate based mucoadhesive system for gatifloxacin and its in vitro antibacterial activity. Sci Pharm. 78:941–957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khairnar AJP, Baviskar D, Jain D. 2009. Developmement of mucoadhesive buccal patch containing aceclofenac: in vitro evaluations. Int J Pharm Tech. 1:978–981.
   Google Scholar
• Koland M, Charyulu RN, Prabhu P. 2010. Mucoadhesive films of losartan potassium for buccal delivery design and characterization. Ind J Pharm Educ Res. 44:315–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar RS, Prabhakar B. 2010. Bioadhesive polymeric platforms for transmucosal drug delivery systems. Trop J Pharm Res. 9:91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. 2000. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci. 89:850–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA, Schacht EH, Junginger HE. 1992. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm. 78:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Johanna AB, Tukker JJ, Junginge HE. 1990. Intestinal transit of bioadhesive microspheres in an in situ loop in the rat-a comparative study with copolymers and blends based on poly (acrylic acid). J Control Rel. 13:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele BS, Hoffman AS. 2000. Mucoadhesive drug carriers based on complexes of poly(acrylic acid) and PEGylated drugs having hydrolysable PEG-anhydride-drug linkages. J Control Release. 69:237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A. 2005. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Del Rev. 57:1595–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majithiya RJ, Ghosh PK, Umrethia ML, Murthy RSR. 2006. Thermoreversible-mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of sumatriptan. AAPS PharmSciTech. 7:67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamatha Y, Rao BP, Ramesh K, Rajarajan S, Beny B, Reddy YV. 2012. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets containing pantoprazole. J Pharm Sci. 2:69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer G, Gurny R, Buri P. 2004. In vivo evaluation of dosage forms: application of gamma scintigraphy to non-enteral routes of administration. J Drug Rel. 2:269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Motwani SK, Chopra S, Talegaonkar S, Kohli K, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK. 2008. Chitosan-sodium alginate nanoparticles as submicroscopic reservoirs for ocular delivery: formulation, optimisation and in vitro characterisation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 68:513–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumaran M, Dhachinamoorthi D, Chandra Sekhar KB, Sriram N. 2011. A review on polymers used in mucoadhesive drug delivery system. Int J Pharm & Ind Res. 1:122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak AK, Hasnain MS, Beg S, Alam MI. 2010. Mucoadhesive beads of gliclazide: design, development, and evaluation. ScienceAsia. 36:319–325.
   Google Scholar
• Palanisamy M, Khanam J, Kumar NA, Rani C. 2009. Chitosan microspheres encapsulated with metoprolol succinate: formulation and in – vitro evaluation. Res J Pharm Tech. 2:349–352.
   Google Scholar
• Park K. 1989. A new approach to study mucoadhesion colloidal gold staining. Int J Pharm. 53:209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel JK, Chavda JR. 2009. Formulation and evaluation of stomach-specific amoxicillin-loaded carbopol-934P mucoadhesive microspheres for anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. J Microencapsul. 2:6365–76.
   Google Scholar
• Patel A, Patel K, Patel J. 2012. Design, development and in vitro evaluation of sertaconazole mucoadhesive vaginal tablet. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 4:418–427.
   Google Scholar
• Patel DM, Patel MJ, Patel AN, Patel CN. 2011. Formulation and evaluation of mixed matrix gastro-retentive drug delivery for famotidine. Int J Pharm Investig. 1:247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Peggs K, Mackinnon S. 2003. Imatinib mesylate–the new gold standard for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 348: 1048–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portero A, Osorio DT, Alonso MJ, Lopez CR. 2007. Development of chitosan sponges for buccal administration of insulin. Carbohyd Polym. 68:617–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranshu T, Madhav NVS. 2011. Recent advances in oral mucoadhesive drug delivery systems: a review. Int J Pharma Res Dev. 3:151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Pund S, Joshi A, Vasu K, Nivsarkar M, Shishoo C. 2011. Gastroretentive delivery of rifampicin: in vitro mucoadhesion and in vivo gamma scintigraphy. Int J Pharm. 411:106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puratchikody A, Prasanth VV, Mathew ST, Kumar AB. 2011. Buccal drug delivery: past, present and future – a review. Int J Drug Deliv. 3:171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaonarivony M, Vauthier C, Couarraze G, Puisieux F, Couvreur P. 1993. Development of a new drug carrier made from alginate. J Pharm Sci. 82:912–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva R, Ragelle H, des Rieux A, Duhem N, Jérôme C, Préat V. 2011. Chitosan and chitosan derivatives in drug delivery and tissue engineering. In: Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Muzzarelli RAA, Eds. Chitosan for Biomaterials II. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sachan N, Bhattacharya K. 2009. A basics and theapeutic potentional of oral mucoadhesive microparticulate drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 1:10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sankar GD, Goyal D, Sharma R, Mehta N, Kumari P, Kunwar SP. 2011. Formulation and evaluation of Mucoadhesive tablets of Famotidine. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 12:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Schnürch BA. 2005. Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57:1569–1582.
   Google Scholar
• Semalty M, Semalty A, Kumar G. 2008. Formulation and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films of glipizide. Ind J Pharm Sci. 70:43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthil V, Gopalakrishnan S, Sureshkumar R, Jawahar N, Ganesh GNK, Nagasamyvenkatesh D. 2010. Mucoadhesive slow-release tablets of theophylline: Design and evaluation. Asian J Pharm. 4:64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Shahi SR, Tribhuwan SD, Tadwee IK, Gupta SK, Zadbuke NS, Shivanikar SS. 2011. Formulation of atenolol mucoadhesive microspheres for nasal delivery by spray drying technique: In vitro/ex vivo Evaluation. Der Pharmacia Sinica. 2:54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh R, Thakur RR, Garland MJ, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. 2011. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 3: 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaei AH, Xiaoling L. 1997. Mechanism of buccal mucoadhesion of novel copolymers of acrylic acid and polyethylene glycol monomethylether monometh-acrylate. J Control Release. 47: 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson HH, Loftsson T, Lehr CM. 2006. Assessment of mucoadhesion by a resonant mirror biosensor. Int J Pharm. 325:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikavitsas V, Nitsche JM, Mountziaris TJ. 2002. Transport and kinetic processes underlying biomolecular interactions in the biacore optical biosensor. Biotechnol Prog. 18:885–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva DJ, Olver JM. (2005). Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) lubricant facilitates insertion of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 21:301–302.
   Google Scholar
• Smart JD. 2005. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57:1556–1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Chidrawar VR, Ushir YV, Vadalia KR, Heth NR, Singh S. 2010. Pharmaceutical characterization of amoxicillin trihydrate as mucoadhesive microspheres in management of H. Pylori. Int J PharmTech Res. 2:348–358.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang Y, Thakur R, Meidan VM, Michniak B. 2004. Mucosal drug delivery: membranes, methodologies, and applications. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 21:195–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strumia MC. 2007. Rheological, dielectric and diffusion analysis of mucin/carbopol matrices used in amperometric biosensors. Sensor Actuat B: Chem. 124:466–476.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. 2006. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery – a Promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release. 114:15–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. 2005. Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesion drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57:1583–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan YT, Peh KK, Hanbali AO. 2000. Effect of Carbopol and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the mechanical, rheological, and release properties of bioadhesive polyethylene glycol gels. AAPS PharmSciTech. 1:69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Verbeke N, Kinget R. 2005. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57:1640–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttarwar S. 2012. Formulation and development of in situ gelling system for nasal administration for an antiemetic drug ondansetron hydrochloride by using Pluronics 127P and Pluronics 68. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci. 3:1103–1118.
   Google Scholar
• Varshosaz J, Karimzadeh S. 2007. Development of cross linked chitosan films for oral mucosal delivery of lidocaine. Res Pharm Sci. 2:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Varum FJO, Veiga F, Sousa JS, Basit AW. 2011. Mucoadhesive platforms for targeted delivery to the colon. Int J Pharm. 420:11–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vinod KR, Reddy R, Sandhya S, Banji D, Reddy V. 2012. Critical review on mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Hygeia J D Med. 4:7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wagh VD, Imandar B, Samanta MK. 2008. Polymers used in ocular dosage form and drug delivery systems. Asian J Pharm. 2:12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Warren SJ, Kellaway IW. 1998. The synthesis and in vitro characterization of the mucoadhesion and swelling of Poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm Dev Tech. 3:199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wee S, Gombotz WR. 1998. Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 31:267–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley J. 2001. Bioadhesion: new possibilities for drug administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 40:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yedurkar P, Dhiman MK, Petkar K, Sawant K. 2012. Mucoadhesive bilayer buccal tablet of carvedilol-loaded chitosan microspheres: in vitro, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations. J Microencapsul. 29:126–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar