Nanogel—an advanced drug delivery tool: Current and future

References

• Abu Samah NH, Heard CM. 2013. Enhanced in vitro transdermal delivery of caffeine using a temperature- and pH-sensitive nanogel, poly(NIPAM-co-AAc). Int J Pharm. 453:630–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyoshi K, Kobayashi S, Shichibe S, Mix D, Baudys M, Wan Kim S, Sunamoto J. 1998. Self-assembled hydrogel nanoparticle of cholesterol-bearing pullulan as a carrier of protein drugs: complexation and stabilization of insulin. J Control Release. 54:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alles N, Soysa NS, Hussain MD, Tomomatsu N, Saito H, Baron R, et al. 2009. Polysaccharide nanogel delivery of a TNF-alpha and RANKL antagonist peptide allows systemic prevention of bone loss. Eur J Pharm Sci. 37:83–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez‐Lorenzo C, Moya‐Ortega MD, Loftsson T, Concheiro A, Torres‐Labandeira JJ. 2011. Cyclodextrin‐Based Hydrogels. Cyclodextrins in Pharmaceutics, Cosmetics, and Biomedicine: Current and Future Industrial Applications New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 297–321.
   Google Scholar
• Bae BC, Na K. 2010. Self-quenching polysaccharide-based nanogels of pullulan/folate-photosensitizer conjugates for photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 31:6325–6335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KH, Mok H, Park TG. 2008. Synthesis, characterization, and intracellular delivery of reducible heparin nanogels for apoptotic cell death. Biomaterials. 29:3376–3383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballal NV, Tweeny A, Baumgartner JC, Ginjupalli K, Saraswathin V. 2013. Effect of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the shear bond strength of RealSeal SE sealer to root canal dentin. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 21:152–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bencherif SA, Siegwart DJ, Srinivasan A, Horkay F, Hollinger JO, Washburn NR, Matyjaszewski K. 2009. Nanostructured hybrid hydrogels prepared by a combination of atom transfer radical polymerization and free radical polymerization. Biomaterials. 30:5270–5278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth C, Attwood D. 2000. Effects of block architecture and composition on the association properties of poly (oxyalkylene) copolymers in aqueous solution. Macromol Rapid Commun. 21:501–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro E, Barbosa S, Juarez J, Taboada P, Katime IA, Mosquera V. 2008. Influence of external factors on the micellization process and aggregate structure of poly(oxy)styrene-poly(oxy)ethylene block copolymers. J Phys Chem B. 112:5296–5304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang T. 2007. Artificial Cells: Biotechnology, Nanotechnology, Regenerative Medicine, Blood Substitutes Bioencapsulation and Cell/Stem Cell Therapy. Singapore: World Scientific/Imperial press, p. 454.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng G, Mi L, Cao Z, Xue H, Yu Q, Carr L, Jiang S. 2010. Functionalizable and ultrastable zwitterionic nanogels. Langmuir. 26: 6883–6886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Jang JY, Joung YK, Kwon MH, Park KD. 2010. Intracellular delivery and anti-cancer effect of self-assembled heparin-Pluronic nanogels with RNase A. J Control Release. 147:420–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoud-Mahammed S, Couvreur P, Bouchemal K, Chéron M, Lebas G, Amiel C, Gref R. 2009. Cyclodextrin and polysaccharide-based nanogels: entrapment of two hydrophobic molecules, benzophenone and tamoxifen. Biomacromolecules. 10:547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denkova AG, Mendes E, Coppens MO. 2008. Effects of salts and ethanol on the population and morphology of triblock copolymer micelles in solution. J Phys Chem B. 112:793–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donini C, Robinson DN, Colombo P, Giordano F, Peppas NA. 2002. Preparation of poly(methacrylic acid-g-poly(ethylene glycol)) nanospheres from methacrylic monomers for pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 245:83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagandeep Garg T, Malik B, Rath G, Goyal AK. 2014. Development and characterization of nano-fiber patch for the treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Pharm Sci. 53:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg T, Arora S, Murthy R, Goyal AK. 2012a. Development, optimization & evaluation of porous chitosan scaffold formulation of gliclazide for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Delive Lett. 2:251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Garg T, Goyal AK. 2014. Biomaterial-based scaffolds – current status and future directions. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 11:767–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg T, Rath G, Goyal AK. 2014. Novel technology to improve drug loading in polymeric nanofibers. Drug Deliv Lett. 4:79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Garg T, Singh O, Arora S, Murthy R. 2012b. Scaffold: a novel carrier for cell and drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 29:1–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg T, Singh S, Goyal AK. 2013. Stimuli-sensitive hydrogels: an excellent carrier for drug and cell delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 30:369–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Fan M, Gao F, Hong J, Liu S, Luo S, et al . 2009. Preparation and characterization of amino-functionalized magnetic nanogels via photopolymerization for MRI applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 71:243–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal G, Garg T, Malik B, Chauhan G, Rath G, Goyal AK. 2013. Development and characterization of niosomal gel for topical delivery of benzoyl peroxide. Drug Deliv.
   Google Scholar
• Gratton SE, Pohlhaus PD, Lee J, Guo J, Cho MJ, Desimone JM. 2007. Nanofabricated particles for engineered drug therapies: a preliminary biodistribution study of PRINT nanoparticles. J Control Release. 121:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gref R, Amiel C, Molinard K, Daoud-Mahammed S, Sebille B, Gillet B, et al . 2006. New self-assembled nanogels based on host-guest interactions: characterization and drug loading. J Control Release. 111:316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Aimetti AA, Wang Q, Dang TT, Zhang Y, Veiseh O, et al . 2013. Injectable nano-network for glucose-mediated insulin delivery. ACS Nano. 7:4194–4201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Ramírez L, Nuño-Donlucas S, Cesteros L, Katime I. 2008. Smart copolymeric nanohydrogels: Synthesis, characterization and properties. Mater Chem Phys. 112:1088–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa U, Sawada S, Shimizu T, Kishida T, Otsuji E, Mazda O, Akiyoshi K. 2009. Raspberry-like assembly of cross-linked nanogels for protein delivery. J Control Release. 140:312–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi H, Iijima M, Kataoka K, Nagasaki Y. 2004. pH-sensitive nanogel possessing reactive PEG tethered chains on the surface. Macromolecules. 37:5389–5396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirakura T, Yasugi K, Nemoto T, Sato M, Shimoboji T, Aso Y, et al . 2010. Hybrid hyaluronan hydrogel encapsulating nanogel as a protein nanocarrier: new system for sustained delivery of protein with a chaperone-like function. J Control Release. 142:483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Xu D, Gong P, Yu J, Ma H, Yao S. 2008. Covalent-bonded immobilization of enzyme on hydrophilic polymer covering magnetic nanogels. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 109:470–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inomoto N, Osaka N, Suzuki T, Hasegawa U, Ozawa Y, Endo H, et al . 2009. Interaction of nanogel with cyclodextrin or protein: study by dynamic light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering. Polymer. 50:541–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayakumar R, Nair A, Rejinold NS, Maya S, Nair S. 2012. Doxorubicin-loaded pH-responsive chitin nanogels for drug delivery to cancer cells. Carbohydr Polym. 87:2352–2356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Alakhov VY. 2002. Pluronic block copolymers in drug delivery: from micellar nanocontainers to biological response modifiers. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 19:1–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Nazarova IR, Astafieva IV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY, Yaroslavov AA, Kabanov VA. 1995. Micelle formation and solubilization of fluorescent probes in poly (oxyethylene-b-oxypropylene-b-oxyethylene) solutions. Macromolecules. 28:2303–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Vinogradov SV. 2009. Nanogels as pharmaceutical carriers: finite networks of infinite capabilities. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 48:5418–5429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataria K, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. 2014. Novel technology to improve drug loading in polymeric nanofibers. Drug Deliv Lett. 4:79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur M, Garg T, Rath G, Goyal AK. 2014. Current nanotechnological strategies for effective delivery of bioactive drug molecules in the treatment of tuberculosis. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 31:49–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettel MJ, Dierkes F, Schaefer K, Moeller M, Pich A. 2011. Aqueous nanogels modified with cyclodextrin. Polymer. 52:1917–1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Park KM, Ko JY, Kwon IC, Cho HG, Kang D, et al. 2008. Minimalism in fabrication of self-organized nanogels holding both anti-cancer drug and targeting moiety. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 63:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli E, Han HY, Zeman AD, Vinogradov SV. 2007. Formulations of biodegradable Nanogel carriers with 5’-triphosphates of nucleoside analogs that display a reduced cytotoxicity and enhanced drug activity. J Control Release. 121:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriwet B, Walter E, Kissel T. 1998. Synthesis of bioadhesive poly(acrylic acid) nano- and microparticles using an inverse emulsion polymerization method for the entrapment of hydrophilic drug candidates. J Control Release. 56:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landfester K, Willert M, Antonietti M. 2000. Preparation of polymer particles in nonaqueous direct and inverse miniemulsions. Macromolecules. 33:2370–2376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Mok H, Lee S, Oh Y-K, Park TG. 2007. Target-specific intracellular delivery of siRNA using degradable hyaluronic acid nanogels. J Control Release. 119:245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JI, Kim HS, Yoo HS. 2009. DNA nanogels composed of chitosan and Pluronic with thermo-sensitive and photo-crosslinking properties. Int J Pharm. 373:93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JI, Yoo HS. 2008. Pluronic decorated-nanogels with temperature-responsive volume transitions, cytotoxicities, and transfection efficiencies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 70:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Alexandridis P. 2002. Cosolvent effects on the micellization of an amphiphilic siloxane graft copolymer in aqueous solutions. Langmuir. 18:4220–4231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luisi PL, Straub B. 1984. Reverse Micelles: Biological and Technological Relevance of Amphiphilic Structures in Apolar Media New York: Plenum Pub Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Remsen EE, Kowalewski T, Wooley KL. 2001. Two-dimensional, shell-cross-linked nanoparticle arrays. J Am Chem Soc. 123: 4627–4628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek SR, Conn CA, Peppas NA. 2010. Cationic nanogels based on diethylaminoethyl methacrylate. Polymer. 51:1237–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok H, Park TG. 2006. PEG-assisted DNA solubilization in organic solvents for preparing cytosol specifically degradable PEG/DNA nanogels. Bioconjug Chem. 17:1369–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak S, Lyon LA. 2005. Soft nanotechnology with soft nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 44:7686–7708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura Y, Ikeda M, Yamaguchi N, Aoyama Y, Akiyoshi K. 2003. Protein refolding assisted by self-assembled nanogels as novel artificial molecular chaperone. FEBS Lett. 553:271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nukolova NV, Oberoi HS, Cohen SM, Kabanov AV, Bronich TK. 2011. Folate-decorated nanogels for targeted therapy of ovarian cancer. Biomaterials. 32:5417–5426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JK, Drumright R, Siegwart DJ, Matyjaszewski K. 2008. The development of microgels/nanogels for drug delivery applications. Prog Polym Sci. 33:448–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JK, Tang C, Gao H, Tsarevsky NV, Matyjaszewski K. 2006. Inverse miniemulsion ATRP: a new method for synthesis and functionalization of well-defined water-soluble/cross-linked polymeric particles. J Am Chem Soc. 128:5578–5584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh NM, Oh KT, Baik HJ, Lee BR, Lee AH, Youn YS, Lee ES. 2010. A self-organized 3-diethylaminopropyl-bearing glycol chitosan nanogel for tumor acidic pH targeting: in vitro evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 78:120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park W, Park SJ, Na K. 2010. Potential of self-organizing nanogel with acetylated chondroitin sulfate as an anti-cancer drug carrier. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 79:501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnami N, Garg T, Rath G, Goyal AK. 2013. Development and characterization of nanocarriers for topical treatment of psoriasis by using combination therapy. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol.
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Qi T, Liao J, Chu B, Yang Q, Li W, et al. 2013. Controlled release of cisplatin from pH-thermal dual responsive nanogels. Biomaterials. 34:8726–8740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raemdonck K, Naeye B, Hogset A, Demeester J, De Smedt SC 2010. Prolonged gene silencing by combining siRNA nanogels and photochemical internalization. J Control Release. 145:281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riess G. 2003. Micellization of block copolymers. Progr Polym Sci. 28:1107–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samah NA, Williams N, Heard CM. 2010. Nanogel particulates located within diffusion cell receptor phases following topical application demonstrates uptake into and migration across skin. Int J Pharm. 401:72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki Y, Asayama W, Niwa T, Sawada SI, Ueda T, Taguchi H, Akiyoshi K. 2011. Amphiphilic Polysaccharide Nanogels as Artificial Chaperones in Cell‐Free Protein Synthesis. Macromol Biosci. 11:814–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki Y, Nomura Y, Sawada S-I, Akiyoshi K. 2010. Polysaccharide nanogel–cyclodextrin system as an artificial chaperone for in vitro protein synthesis of green fluorescent protein. Polym J. 42:823–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada S-I, Sasaki Y, Nomura Y, Akiyoshi K. 2011. Cyclodextrin- responsive nanogel as an artificial chaperone for horseradish peroxidase. Colloid Polym Sci. 289:685–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W, Chang Y, Liu G, Wang H, Cao A, An Z. 2011. Biocompatible, antifouling, and thermosensitive core− shell nanogels synthesized by RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization. Macromolecules. 44:2524–2530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y, Chang JH, Liu J, Williford R, Exarhos GJ. 2001. Hybrid nanogels for sustainable positive thermosensitive drug release. J Control Release. 73:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Sharma R, Joshi M, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. 2014. Transmucosal delivery of Docetaxel by mucoadhesive polymeric nanofibers. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol.
   Google Scholar
• Singka GS, Samah NA, Zulfakar MH, Yurdasiper A, Heard CM. 2010. Enhanced topical delivery and anti-inflammatory activity of methotrexate from an activated nanogel. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 76:275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Yu J, Gong P, Xu D, Hong J, Zhang C, Yao S. 2006. Novel core–shell magnetic nanogels synthesized in an emulsion-free aqueous system under UV irradiation for potential targeted radiopharmaceutical applications. Int J Nanosci. 5:253–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Yu J, Gong P, Xu D, Zhang C, Yao S. 2005. Novel core–shell magnetic nanogels synthesized in an emulsion-free aqueous system under UV irradiation for targeted radiopharmaceutical applications. J Magn Magn Mater. 294:273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Sawada S-I, Akiyoshi K. 2010. Amphiphilic polysaccharide nanoballs: a new building block for nanogel biomedical engineering and artificial chaperones. ACS Nano. 5:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura A, Oishi M, Nagasaki Y. 2010. Efficient siRNA delivery based on PEGylated and partially quaternized polyamine nanogels: enhanced gene silencing activity by the cooperative effect of tertiary and quaternary amino groups in the core. J Control Release. 146: 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP, Wang Q, Tam KC. 2008. Control of burst release from nanogels via layer by layer assembly. J Control Release. 128:248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov SV, Bronich TK, Kabanov AV. 2002. Nanosized cationic hydrogels for drug delivery: preparation, properties and interactions with cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 54:135–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov SV, Zeman AD, Batrakova EV, Kabanov AV. 2005. Polyplex Nanogel formulations for drug delivery of cytotoxic nucleoside analogs. J Control Release. 107:143–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintiloiu A, Leroux J-C. 2008. Organogels and their use in drug delivery—a review. J Control Release. 125:179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Mallela J, Garapati US, Ravi S, Chinnasamy V, Girard Y, et al . 2013. A chitosan-modified graphene nanogel for noninvasive controlled drug release. Nanomedicine. 9:903–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang NX, von Recum HA. 2011. Affinity‐Based Drug Delivery. Macromolecular Bioscience. 11:321–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Xu H, Yang X, Yang Y. 2008. Drug release behavior from in situgelatinized thermosensitive nanogel aqueous dispersions. Int J Pharm. 361:189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JE, Mu ller CB, DI ez-Pascual AM, Richtering W. 2009. Study of layer-by-layer films on thermoresponsive nanogels using temperature-controlled dual-focus fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B. 113:15907–15913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Aiello M, Zhou T, Berliner A, Banerjee P, Zhou S. 2010. In-situ immobilization of quantum dots in polysaccharide-based nanogels for integration of optical pH-sensing, tumor cell imaging, and drug delivery. Biomaterials. 31:3023–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing Z, Wang C, Yan J, Zhang L, Li L, Zha L. 2011. Dual stimuli responsive hollow nanogels with IPN structure for temperature controlling drug loading and pH triggering drug release. Soft Matter. 7: 7992–7997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu DM, Yao SD, Liu YB, Sheng KL, Hong J, Gong PJ, Dong L. 2007. Size-dependent properties of M-PEIs nanogels for gene delivery in cancer cells. Int J Pharm. 338:291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Tao W. 2010. One-step synthesis of pegylated cationic nanogels of poly ( N, N′-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) in aqueous solution via self-stabilizing micelles using an amphiphilic macroRAFT agent. Polymer. 51:2161–2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Yao P, Jiang M, Zhang G. 2006. Nanogels prepared by self-assembly of oppositely charged globular proteins. Biopolymers. 83:148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamurovic M, Christodoulou S, Vazaios A, Iatrou E, Pitsikalis M, Hadjichristidis N. 2007. Micellization behavior of complex comblike block copolymer architectures. Macromolecules. 40:5835–5849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar