Electrospun polycaprolactone matrices with tensile properties suitable for soft tissue engineering

References

• Asran A, Salama M, Popescu C, Michler GH. 2010. Solvent influences the morphology and mechanical properties of electrospun poly(L-lactic acid) scaffold for Tissue Engineering Applications. Macromol Symp. Special issue: Layered Nanostructure-Polymer with improved properties. 294:153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Boontheekul T, Hill EE, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ. 2007. Regulating Myoblast Phenotype Through Controlled Gel Stiffness and Degradation. Tissue Eng. 13:1431–1442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciardelli G, Chiono V, Vozzi G, Pracella M, Ahluwalia A, Barbani N, et al. 2005. Blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) and polysaccharides in tissue engineering applications. Biomacromlecules. 6:1961–1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 126:677–689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudio DC, Bianco A, Grigioni M. 2008. Electrospun bioresorbable trileaflet heart valve prosthesis for tissue engineering: in vitro functional assessment of a pulmonary cardiac valve design. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 44:178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R. 2003. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater. 5:1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackett JM, Dang TT, Eve C, Tsai EC and Cao X. 2010. Electrospun Biocomposite Polycaprolactone/Collagen Tubes as Scaffolds for Neural Stem Cell Differentiation. Materials. 3:3714–3728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii O, Shin M, Sueda T 2005. In vitro tissue engineering of a cardiac graft using a degradable scaffold with an extracellular matrix–like topography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 130:1358–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacot JG, McCulloch AD, Omens JH. 2008. Substrate Stiffness Affects the Functional Maturation of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes. Biophys J. 95:3479–3487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Niehaus A, Nichols S, Lee D, Koepsel J, Anderson D, Lannutti J. 2009. Electrospun PCL in vitro: a microstructural basis for mechanical property changes. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 20:467–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliana RD, Filipe EA, Paulo JB. 2013. Influence of the rheological behaviour in electrospun PCL nanofi bres production for tissue engineering applications. In: Chemical Engineering Transactions. AIDIC 32:1015–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Kanani AG, Bahrami SH. 2011. Effect of changing solvents on Poly (e-caprolactone) nanofibrous webs morphology. J Nanomater. 2011:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Park SJ, Gu BK, Kim CH. 2012a. Polycaprolactone-chitin nanofibrous mats as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Nanomater. Article ID. 635212:doi:10.1155/2012/635212
   Google Scholar
• Kim HN, Kang DH, Kim MS, Jiao A, Kim DH, Suh KY. 2012. Patterning methods for polymers in cell and tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 40:1339–1355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, Tuan RS. 2003. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(epsilon-caprolac- tone) scaffolds. J. Biomed Mater Res A. 67:1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, Derfoul A, Danielson, KG Hall, DJ, Tuan RS. 2005. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 26:599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Mauck RL, Cooper JA, Yaun X, Tuan RS. 2007. Engineering Controllable Anisotropy in Electrospun Biodegradable Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. J Biomech. 40(8):1686–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, JC, Tipton AJ. 2000. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials. 21:2335–2346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi FL, Sung H, Shyu S. 2000. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan-based network prepared using naturally occurring crosslinker. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem. 38:2804–2814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarakeh LG, Semnani D, Morshed MA. 2007. A Novel method for porosity measurement of various surface layers of nanofibers mat using image analysis for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 106:2536–2542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S. 2014. Influence of solvents properties on morphology of electrospun polyurethane nanofiber mats. Polymer Adv Tech. 25:179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh SH, Chatterjee K, Lin-Gibson S, Moore NM, Cicerone MT, Young MF, Simon CG Jr. 2011. Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal tension. Biomaterials. 32:2256–2264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. 2006. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng. 12:1197–1211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saha K, Keung AJ, Irwin EF, Li Y, Little L, Schaffer DV, Healy KE. 2008. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J. 95:4426–4438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueren LV, Schoenmaker B, Kalaoglu OI, Clerck K 2011. An alternative solvent system for the steady state electrospinning of polycaprolactone. Eur Polym J. 4:1256–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Mohanty S, Gupta D, Jassal M, Agrawal AK, Tandon R. 2011. Cellular response of limbal epithelial cells on electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds for ocular surface bioengineering: a preliminary in vitro study. Molecular Vision. 17:2898–2910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin M, Ishii O, Sueda T, Vacanti JP. 2004. Contractile cardiac grafts using a novel nanofibrous mesh. Biomaterials. 25:3717–3723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin M, Yoshimoto H, Vacanti JP. 2004. In vivo bone tissue engineering using mesenchymal stem cells on a novel electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. Tissue Eng. 10:33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun H, Mei L, Song C, Cui X, Wang P. 2006. The in vivo degradation, absorption and excretion of PCL-based implant. Biomaterials. 27:1735–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar S, Ghebes CA, Ahmed M, Kelder C, van Blitterswijk CA, Saris D, et al. 2013. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular matrix influences gene expression of chondrocytes. Biofabrication. 5:doi:10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogeshwar CV, Gnanamani A, Giridev VR, Madhusoothanan M, Sekaran G. 2012. Electrospinning of Type I Collagen and PCL Nanofibers Using Acetic Acid. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 125:3221–3227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto H, Shin, YM, Terai H, Vacanti JP. 2003. A biodegradable nanofibers scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 24:2077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Sieminski AL, Mackellar D, Gong H, Kamm RD, et al. 2006. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell–matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA. 103:10889–10894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeugolis DI, Khew ST, Yew ES, Ekaputra AK, Tong YW, Yung LY, et al. 2008. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres Just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials. 29:2293–2305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ouyang H, Lim CT, Ramakrishna S, Huang ZM. 2005. Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 72:156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorlutuna P, Elsheikh A, Hasirci V.. 2009. Nanopatterning of collagen scaffolds improve the mechanical properties of tissue engineered vascular grafts. Biomacromolecules. 10:814–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar