Ti implants with nanostructured and HA-coated surfaces for improved osseointegration

References

• Ágata de Sena L, Calixto de Andrade M, Malta Rossi A, de Almeida Soares G. 2002. Hydroxyapatite deposition by electrophoresis on titanium sheets with different surface finishing. J Biomed Mater Res. 60:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. 2000a. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res. 49:155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Linez P, Bigerelle M, Le Maguer D, Le Maguer A, Hardouin P, et al. 2000b. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. Biomaterials. 21:1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächle M, Kohal R. 2004. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15:683–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani R, De Ruijter A, Renggli H, Jansen J. 1999. Response of rat bone marrow cells to differently roughened titanium discs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 10:369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper L. 2000. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants 1. J Prosthet Dent. 84:522–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz M, Soares G, Coelho M, Fernandes M. 2002. Surface topography modulates the osteogenesis in human bone marrow cell cultures grown on titanium samples prepared by a combination of mechanical and acid treatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 13:421–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng B, Weng J, Yang B, Qu S, Zhang X. 2003. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials. 24:4663–4670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiaggi M, Coombs NA, Pilliar R. 1991. Characterization of the interface in the plasma-sprayed HA coating/Ti-6Al-4V implant system. J Biomed Mater Res. 25:1211–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giavaresi G, Fini M, Cigada A, Chiesa R, Rondelli G, Rimondini L, et al. 2003. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of titanium implants with different surface treatments inserted in sheep cortical bone. Biomaterials. 24:1583–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwein L, Webster T. 2004. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials. 25:4175–4183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Yao X. 2005. Preparation and characterization of rutile TiO2 thin films by mist plasma evaporation: Surface and Coatings. Technology. 191:54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ji H, Ponton C, Marquis P. 1992. Microstructural characterization of hydroxyapatite coating on titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 3:283–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T. 1991. Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. Biomaterials. 12:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T. 1990. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface structure changes in bioactive glass ceramic A-W3. J Biomed Mater Res. 24:721–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Kim HM, Nakamura T. 1996. Spontaneous formation of bonelike apatite layer on chemically treated titanium metals. J Am Ceram Soc. 79:1127–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Takadama H. 2006. How useful is sbf in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 27:2907–2915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusakabe H, Sakamaki T, Nihei K, Oyama Y, Yanagimoto S, Ichimiya M, et al. 2004. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem. Biomaterials. 25:2957–2969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macák J, Tsuchiya H, Schmuki P. 2005. High-aspect-ratio TiO2 nanotubes by anodization of titanium. Angew Chem Int Ed. 44: 2100–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavis B, Demirtas TT, Gümüsderelioglu M, Gündüz G, Çolak Ü. 2009. Synthesis, characterization and osteoblastic activity of polycaprolactone nanofibers coated with biomimetic calcium phosphate. Acta Biomater. 5:3098–3111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni A, Caja V, Egger E, Trinchese L, Chao EY. 1994. Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants. Biomaterials. 15:926–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni A, Rocca M, Faldini C, Stea S, Giardino R, Giannini S. 1999. Hydroxyapatite fully coated conic hip prosthetic stem: A long term animal study. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 88:198–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. 2007. Nanosize and vitality: Tio2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 7:1686–1691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado da Silva M, Lima J, Soares G, Elias C, De Andrade M, Best S, Gibson I. 2001. Transformation of monetite to hydroxyapatite in bioactive coatings on titanium. Surf Coat Technol. 137:270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripamonti U, Roden LC, Renton LF. 2012. Osteoinductive hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. Biomaterials. 33:3813–3823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M, Aslani A, Sambito MA, Kalkhoran NM, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. 2008. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite/titania coatings on titanium improves osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 84:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, Röler S, Sewing A, Hüttmann C. 2003. Biological performance of biomimetic calcium phosphate coating of titanium implants in the dog mandible. J Biomed Mater Res A. 64:225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Pedersen CM, Bünger C. 1990. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants: a comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit. Acta Orthopaedica. 61:299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak JM, Ricci JL, Blumenthal NC, Alexander H. 1990. A new canine model to evaluate the biological response of intramedullary bone to implant materials and surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 24:1121–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Röser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. 2001. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. Mater Sci Mater Med. 12:1025–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui Y, Doyle C, Clyne T. 1998. Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium substrates. Part 1:Mechanical properties and residual stress levels. Biomaterials. 19: 2015–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler SL. 1996. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11:340–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Yang JH. 2010. Effect of a macroscopic groove on bone response and implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21:1379–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Liang C, Lew D, Park JB, Keller JC. 1999. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 57:1096–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. 2004. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials. 25:4087–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar