References
- Rai K R, Peterson B L, Appelbaum F R, et al. Fludarabine compared with chlorambucil as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343: 1750–1757
- Leporrier M, Chevret S, Cazin B, et al. French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Randomized comparison of fludarabine, CAP, and CHOP in 938 previously untreated stage B and C chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Blood 2001; 98: 2319–2325
- Catovsky D, Richards S, Hillmen P. Early results from LRF CLL4: a UK multicenter randomized trial. Blood 2001; 106: 212a, (abstract 716).
- Levy V, Porcher R, Delabarre F, et al. the French Cooperative CLL Group. Evaluating treatment strategies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: use of quality-adjusted survival analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2001; 54: 747–754
- Nomenclature Générale des Actes Professionnels – Nomenclature des Actes de Biologie Médicale. Union de Caisses Nationales de Sécurité Sociale.
- Selke B, Bercez C, Lenne X, et al. Adjuvant treatment of cancer of the breast: cost assessment of the protocol used. Bulletin du Cancer 2001; 85: 961–966, [in French]
- Rossi J F, van Hoof A, de Boeck K, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral fludarabine phosphate in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 11: 1260–1267
- Weintein M C. From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation: where to draw the line? In:. Valuing Health Care. FA Sloan. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 1995; 77–97
- Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 1997
- Doubilet P, Begg C B, Weinstein M C, et al. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Medical Decision Making 2001; 5: 155–177
- Pasta D J, Taylor J L, Henning J M. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis incorporating the bootstrap: an example comparing treatments for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Medical Decision Making 2001; 19: 353–363