References
- Lillehei CW, Gott VL, DeWall RA, et al. Surgical correction of pure mitral insufficiency by annuloplasty under direct vision. J Lancet 1957;77(11):446-9
- Rao PN, Kumar AS. Aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Tex Heart Inst J 1993;20(4):307-8
- Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145(5):1222-6
- Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM, et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90(1):131-5
- Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders, PC et al. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13(6):887-93
- Murtuza B, Pepper JR, Stanbidge, RD et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85(3):1121-31
- Cunningham MJ, Berberian CE, Starnes, VA. Is Transthoracic Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Too Time-Consuming for the Busy Cardiac Surgeon? Innovations (Phila) 2011;6(1):10-14
- Premier Research Services—Premier Inc. Available at: http://www.premier-inc.com/prs. Accessed December, 2012.
- Averill RF, Goldfield N, Hughes J, et al. What Are APR-DRGs? An Introduction to Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality Adjustment Methodology. Salt Lake City, UT: 3M Health Information Systems. 2003
- Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88(6):1851-6
- Glower DD, Lee T, Desai B. Aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy in 306 consecutive patients. Innovations (Phila) 2010;5(5):326-30
- Johnston DR, Atik FA, Rajeswaran J, et al. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144(4):852-58 e3
- Doll N, Borger MA, Hain J, et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002. 74(4):S1318-22
- Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, et al. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 2004;240(3):529-34; discussion 534
- Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137(3):670-9 e5
- Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81(5):1599-604
- Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16 Suppl 2:S80-3
- Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73(2):460-5; discussion 465-6
- Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997;226(4):421-6; discussion 427-8