A selective review of the first 20 years of instrumental variables models in health-services research and medicine

References

• U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Procedure Manual – Section 4: Evidence Report Development. 2014. Washington, DC. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/procedure-manual—section-4. Accessed October 23, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987;317:141-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remler DK, Van Ryzin GG. Research methods in practice: strategies for description and causation. 2nd edn. New York: Sage Publications, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S. Mostly harmless econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Greene W. Econometric analyses. 7th edn. New York: Prentice Hall, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Woodridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross-sectional and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Martens EP, Pestman WR, deBoer A, et al. Instrumental variables: application and Limitations. Epidemiology 2006;17:260-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan SL, Winship C. Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007
   Google Scholar
• McClellan M, McNeil BJ, Newhouse JP. Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. JAMA 1994;272:859-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker R. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variables is weak. J Am Statist Assoc 1995;90:443-450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat 2002;20:518-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Wehner P. Physician-induced demand for childbirths. J Health Econ 1994;13:61-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Imbens G, Rubin D. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Statist Assoc 1996;91:444-55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovey AJ, Green DP. Instrumental variables estimation in political science: a reader’s guide. Am J Polit Sci 2010;55:188-200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JJ, Ewer SM, Wagner TH. Returns to physician human capital: evidence from patients randomized to physician teams. J Health Econ 2010;29:866-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X-H, Li SM. ITT analysis of randomized encouragement design studies with missing data. Stat Med 2006;25:2737-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch S, Baiocchi M, Ahlberg C, et al. The differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants. Pediatrics 2012;130:270-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks JM, Irwin CP, Hunsicker LG, et al. Effect of dialysis center profit-status on patient survival: a comparison of risk adjustment and instrumental variable approaches. Health Serv Res 2006;41:2267-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell KJ, Newgard CD, Mullins RJ, et al. Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head injured patients. Health Serv Res 2005;40:435-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Town R. Estimating the quality of care in hospitals using instrumental variables. J Health Econ 1999;18:747-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart M, Schneeweiss S. Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results. Int J Biostatist 2007;14:1-23
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart MA, Wang PS, Solomon DH, et al. Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable. Epidemiology 2006;17:268-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweiss S, Seeger JD, Landon J, et al. Aprotinin during coronary-artery bypass grafting and risk of death. N Engl J Med 2008;358:771-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoor C, Caputo A, Schumacher M. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1120-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Chrischilles E, Scott S, et al. Was breast conserving surgery underutilized for early stage breast cancer? Instrumental variables evidence for stage II patients from Iowa. Health Serv Res 2004;38:1385-402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukel TA, Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, et al. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. JAMA 2007;297:278-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestas N, Mullen KJ, Strand A. Does disability insurance receipt discourage work? Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects of SSDI receipt. Am Econ Rev 2013;103:1797-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisemartin C. Tolerating defiance? Local average treatment effects without monotonicity. Working paper. Warwick: University of Warwick, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Ho V, Hamilton BH, Roos LL. Multiple approaches to assessing the effects of delays for hip fracture patients in the United States and Canada. Health Serv Res 2000;34:1499-518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya J, Shaikh AM, Vytlacil E. Treatment effect bounds: an application to Swan-Ganz catheterization. J Econometrics 2012;168:223-43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth JM, Norton EC, Kaufman SR, et al. Medical expulsive therapy versus early endoscopic stone removal for acute renal colic: an instrumental variable analysis. J Urol 2013;190:882-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui H, Hashimoto H, Horiguchi H, et al. An exploration of the association between very early rehabilitation and outcome for the patients with acute ischaemic stroke in Japan: a nationwide retrospective cohort survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer TM, Thompson JR, Tobin MD. Meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies incorporating all three genotypes. Stat Med 2008;27:6570-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehby GL, Ohsfeldt RL, Murray JC. ‘Mendelian randomization’ equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments. Stat Med 2008;27:2745-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley D. The promise and challenges of incorporating genetic data into longitudinal social science surveys and research. Biodemogr Soc Biol 2009;55:238-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Han E, Norton EC. The validity of genes related to neurotransmitters as instrumental variables. Health Econ 2011;20:884-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hinke Kessler Scholder S, Davey Smith G, Lawlor DA, Propper C, Windmeijer F. Mendelian randomization: the use of genes in instrumental variable analyses. Health Econ 2011;20:893-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpson NJ, Harbord R, Davey Smith G, et al. Does greater adiposity increase blood pressure and hypertension risk?: Mendelian randomization using the FTO/MC4R genotype. Hypertension 2009;54:84-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voight BF, Peloso GM, Orho-Melander M, et al. Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a Mendelian randomisation study. Lancet 2012;380:572-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawley J. An instrumental variables approach to measuring the effect of body weight on employment disability. Health Serv Res 2000;35:1159-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ 2012;31:219-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C, Biener A, et al. Forthcoming. Savings in medical expenditures associated with reductions in Body Mass Index among adults with obesity, by Diabetes Status. Pharmacoeconomics DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0230-2
   Google Scholar
• Smith GD, Jonathan ACS, Abigail F, et al. The association between BMI and mortality using offspring BMI as an indicator of own BMI: large intergenerational mortality study. Br Med J 2009;339:b5043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French MT, Popovici I. That instrument is lousy! In search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research. Health Econ 2011;20:127-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashad I, Kaestner R. Teenage sex, drugs and alcohol use: problems identifying the cause of risky behaviors. J Health Econ 2004;23:493-503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Have TR, Ten MR, Elliott MJ, et al. Causal models for randomized physician encouragement trials in treating primary care depression. J Am Statis Assoc 2004;99:16-25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehby G, Jugessur A, Murray JC, et al. Genes as instruments for studying risk behavior effects: an application to maternal smoking and orofacial clefts. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2011;11:54-78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar