41
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Multiplicative Invalidity and Its Application to Complex Correlational Models

Pages 215-239 | Published online: 19 Aug 2010

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1971). Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behavior. Sociometry, 34, 263-280.
  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Anderson, L. R., & Fishbein, M. (1965). Prediction of attitude from the number, strength, and evaluative aspects of beliefs about the attitude object: A comparison of summation and congruity theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 437-443.
  • Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444-472.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Blalock, H. M. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
  • Fishbein, M. (1980). A theory of reasoned action: Some aplications and implications. In H. E. Howe (Ed.), 1979 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 65-116. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fishbein, M., & Hunter, R. (1964). Summation versus balance in attitude organization and change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 505-510.
  • Fogg, L., & Gross, D. (2000). Threats to validity in randomized clinical trials. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 79-87.
  • Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101-128.
  • Gross, D., & Fogg, D. (2001). Clinical trials in the 21st century: The case for participantcentered research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 530-539.
  • Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
  • Hope, K. (1984). As others see us: Schooling and social mobility in Scotland and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
  • Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lederman, L. (1993). The God particle: If the universe is the answer, what is the question? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Link, B. G., & Shrout, P. E. (1992). Spurious associations in longitudinal research. Research in Community and Mental Health, 7, 301-321.
  • Liu, K. (1988). Measurement error and its impact on partial correlation and multiple linear regression analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 864-874.
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance abuse research. Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 4, 173-181.
  • McClendon, M. J. (1994). Multiple regression and causal analysis. Ithaca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Mulaik, S. A. (1987). Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling. Child Development, 58, 18-32.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241-302.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA,:Wadsworth.
  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
  • Popper, K. R. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
  • Popper, K. R. (1983). Realism and the aim of science. New York: Routledge.
  • Rogosa, D. (1987). Causal models do not support scientific conclusions: A comment in support of Freedman. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 185-195.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem. Psychological Review, 110, 526-535.
  • Trafimow, D. (2004). Problems with change in R2 as applied to Theory of Reasoned Action research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 515-530.
  • Trafimow, D. (2005). The ubiquitous Laplacian assumption: Reply to Lee and Wagenmakers. Psychological Review, 112, 669-674.
  • Trafimow, D., & Borrie, W. T. (1999). Influencing future behavior by priming past behavior: A test in the context of Petrified Forest National Park. Leisure Sciences, 21, 31-42.
  • Trafimow, D., Bromgard, I. K., Finlay, K. A., & Ketelaar, T. (2005). The role of affect in determining the attributional weight of immoral behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 935-948.
  • Trafimow, D., & Sheeran, P. (1998). Some tests of the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 378-397.
  • Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K. A. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavioral control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 101-121.
  • Verplanken, B., & Faes, S. (1999). Good intentions, bad habits, and effects of forming implementation intentions on healthy eating. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 591-604.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.