References
- Achinstein, P. 2002. Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?, Journal of Philosophy 99(9): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/3655684
- Chakravartty, A. 2008. What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived, Philosophical Studies 137(1): 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–007–9173–1
- Enfield, P. 2008. Review of P. Kyle Stanford’s Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59(4): 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axn042
- Fahrbach, L. 2011a. How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change, Synthese 180(2): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–009–9602–0
- Fahrbach, L. 2011b. Theory Change and Degrees of Success, Philosophy of Science 78(5): 1283–1292. https://doi.org/10.1086/662280
- Fitzpatrick, S. 2013. Doing Away with the no Miracles Argument, in Karakostas, V.; Dieks, D. (Eds.). EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. Series: The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings. Stadler, F. (Ed.). Geneva: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 141–151.
- Godfrey-Smith, P. 2008. Recurrent Transient Underdetermination and the Glass Half Full, Philosophical Studies 137(1): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–007–9172–2
- Hannaway, C. 1993. Environment and Miasmata, in Bynum, W. F.; Porter, R. (Eds.). Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. Vol. 1. New York: Routledge, 292–308.
- Harker, D. 2008. Review of P. Kyle Stanford’s Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Philosophy of Science 75(2): 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1086/590203
- Hume, D. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kitcher, Ph. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
- Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Lipton, P. 2001. Quests of a Realist: Review Symposia, Metascience 10(3): 347–353.
- Lloyd, G. E. R. (Ed.). 1983. Hippocratic Writings. Series: Penguin Classics. London: Penguin Group.
- Mach, E. 1911. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
- Mizrahi, M. 2013. The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far, Synthese 190(15): 3209–3226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–012–0138–3
- Mizrahi, M. 2015. Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-Picking, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29(2): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2015.1119413
- Mizrahi, M. Forthcoming. The History of Science as a Graveyard of Theories: A Philosophers’ Myth?, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
- Park, S. 2016. Refutations of the Two Pessimistic Inductions, Philosophia 44(3): 835–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406–016–9733–8
- Park, S. 2017a. Defense of Epistemic Reciprocalism, Filosofija. Sociologija 28(1): 56–64.
- Park, S. 2017b. The Uniformity Principle vs. the Disuniformity Principle, Acta Analytica 32(2): 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136–016–0302–3
- Park, S. Forthcoming. Why Should We Be Pessimistic about Antirealists and Pessimists?, Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699–016–9490-y
- Poincaré, H. 1952. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
- Psillos, S. 2009. Grasping at Realist Straws: Review Symposium, Metascience 18 [online], [cited 3 February 2016]. Available from Internet: http://users.uoa.gr/~psillos/PapersI/25-symposium-Stanford.pdf
- Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Series: Philosophical Issues in Science. Newton-Smith, W. H. (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
- Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
- Roush, Sh. 2010. Optimism about the Pessimistic Induction, in Magnus, P. D.; Busch, J. (Eds.). New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–0-230–29719–7_3
- Ruhmkorff, S. 2011. Some Difficulties for the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Philosophy of Science 78(5): 875–886. https://doi.org/10.1086/662273
- Saatsi, J. 2009. Grasping at Realist Straws: Review Symposium, Metascience 18 [online], [cited 3 February 2016]. Available from Internet: http://users.uoa.gr/~psillos/PapersI/25-symposium-Stanford.pdf doi: 10.1007/s11016-009-9299-1
- Stanford, P. K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195174089.001.0001
- Stanford, P. K. 2009. Grasping at Realist Straws: Author’s Response, Metascience 18 [online], [cited 3 February 2016]. Available from Internet: http://users.uoa.gr/~psillos/PapersI/25-sympo-sium-Stanford.pdf
- Stanford, P. K. 2015. Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate That Makes a Difference, Philosophy of Science 82(5): 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1086/683325
- Worrall, J. 1989. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?, Dialectica 43(1–2): 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746–8361.1989.tb00933.x
- Wray, K. B. 2010. Selection and Predictive Success, Erkenntnis 72(3): 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670–009–9206–6
- Wray, K. B. 2013. The Pessimistic Induction and the Exponential Growth of Science Reassessed, Synthese 190(18): 4321–4330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–013–0276–2