About this journal
Aims and scope
The Review of Communication is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. The Review of Communication publishes original scholarship that advances the discipline and practice of communication through the study of major themes that cross disciplinary subfields. Following the intellectually and academically cosmopolitan tradition of the journal, we invite substantive essays that not only review controversies and trajectories in communication scholarship, but also contribute to the major issues that span our discipline. Such macro-interpretive studies may be historical, theoretical, philosophical, qualitative, quantitative, rhetorical, or syncretic. The Review of Communication welcomes essays that build theory, advance our understanding of a method, extend or challenge a current paradigm, bridge a divide, clarify a term or concept, or demonstrate a pragmatic function.
To accomplish this mission, beginning with Vol. 20, Review of Communication will publish four themed issues a year. Future submissions to the journal should either respond to a call for articles for one of the upcoming themed issues, or should consist of proposals to guest edit an issue with a detailed rationale for the issue, a 20–25 item bibliography of relevant works on the theme, and a draft of a call for papers inviting authors to address the proposed theme.
For more details about how to submit your research to Review of Communication , please review our Instructions for Authors.
A list of all current calls for upcoming themes issues can be found here.
Unless specifically indicated otherwise, articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, including screening by the editor and review by at least two anonymous referees.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 64K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 1.7 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q2 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 0.000 (2023) SNIP
- 0.234 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 46 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 55 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 31% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Stephen Croucher, Massey University, New Zealand
Associate Editors
Stephanie Kelly – North Carolina A&T State University
Uttaran Dutta – Arizona State University
Editorial Board
Amy Aldridge Sanford – Middle Tennessee State University
Carolyn Calloway-Thomas – Indiana University
François Cooren – University of Montreal
Daniel Cronn-Mills – Minnesota State University, Mankato
Joanna Cullinane – Massey University
Audra Diers-Lawson – Kristiania University
Nadirabegim Eskiçorapçı – Yeditepe University
Angela Feekery – Massey University
Kory Floyd – University of Arizona
Janie Harden Fritz – Duquesne University
Davide Girardelli – University of Gothenburg
William Keith – University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager – Colorado State University
Kathleen McConnell – San Jose State University
Shane T. Moreman - California State University, Fresno
Eddah Mutua – Saint Cloud State University
Desiree Rowe – Towson University
Timothy Sellnow – University of Central Florida
Anthony Spencer – Grand Valley State University
Kyle Vareberg – Northeastern State University
Michelle Violanti – University of Tennessee
Cheng Zeng – North Dakota State University
Reviewers
All submissions to the Review of Communication undergo anonymous peer review and the journal's new format requires a wide range of expertise. Everyone who reviews for the journal is recognized for their service in Issue 4 of each volume.
Abstracting and indexing
Abstracted/ Indexed in: Communication and Mass Media Complete and Current Abstracts
Open access
Review of Communication is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
Calls for papers
Association information
The National Communication Association advances Communication as the discipline that studies all forms, modes, media, and consequences of communication through humanistic, social scientific, and aesthetic inquiry.
The National Communication Association publishes 12 journals:
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies
Critical Studies in Media Communication
Journal of Applied Communication Research
Journal of International and Intercultural Communication
Text and Performance Quarterly
NCA members receive online access to all current and archive content from each of the National Communication Association journals. Members also receive online access to a selection of four additional Routledge, Taylor & Francis journals.
To explore the whole NCA journals portfolio, visit the NCA Online Journals Platform.
Review of Communication is a peer-reviewed publication of the NCA. For more details about how to submit your research to Review of Communication , please review our Instructions for Authors.
To register as a peer reviewer for Review of Communication , visit the submission site to create an account. Discover our Peer Reviewer Training Network.
4 issues per year
Associated with:
- Communication Teacher (2000 - current)
- Journal of Applied Communication Research (1973 - current)
- Communication Education (1976 - current)
- Communication Monographs (1976 - current)
- Journal of International and Intercultural Communication (2008 - current)
- Communication and Democracy (2022 - current)
- Text and Performance Quarterly (1989 - current)
- Quarterly Journal of Speech (1915 - current)
- Critical Studies in Media Communication (2000 - current)
- Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies (2004 - current)
National Communication Association and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, National Communication Association and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by National Communication Association and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. National Communication Association and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors