About this journal
Aims and scope
The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative governance, practice, and assessment of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts, legal scholars, natural scientists, and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation. These approaches include:
- ethics,
- technology assessment,
- governance,
- sustainability,
- public engagement,
- management and strategy
- socio-technical integration, and others.
JRI invites three kinds of written contributions:
- research articles of 6,000 to 10,000 words in length, inclusive of notes and references, that communicate original theoretical or empirical investigations;
- perspectives of approximately 2,000 words in length that communicate opinions, summaries, or reviews of timely issues, publications, cultural or social events, or other activities;
- pedagogy communicating in appropriate length experience in or studies of teaching, training, and learning related to responsible innovation in formal (e.g., classroom) and informal (e.g., museum) environments.
JRI is open to alternative styles or genres of writing beyond the traditional research paper or report, including creative or narrative nonfiction, dialogue, and first-person accounts, provided that scholarly completeness and integrity are retained. JRI welcomes other kinds of appropriate contributions that could include photo-essays, videos, etc.
JRI actively encourages proposals for special issues in appropriate cutting-edge areas, and these should be discussed directly with the Editor-in-Chief.
Peer review policy
Upon receipt of a submitted manuscript, the Editorial Office will assess its relevance to the mission of the journal and its conformity to its technical requirement. Given a positive assessment, the Editorial Office will seek the advice of anonymous peer reviewers to evaluate the intellectual quality of the manuscript. The decision to accept or reject the manuscript rests with the Editorial Office. All peer review is double anonymized, and submissions can be made online on our Submission Portal.
Publishing Ethics
The Journal adheres to the highest standards of publishing ethics, with rigorous processes in place to ensure this is achieved. Taylor & Francis is a member of Committee of Publications Ethics (COPE) and utilises CrossCheck for all Journals. More information on our ethical standards and policies can be found here: http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/ethics-for-authors/
The Journal has an appeals and complaints policy which can be viewed here: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/peer-review-appeals-and-complaints-from-authors/.
*Please note that Journal of Responsible Innovation converted to a fully Open Access journal beginning with Volume 8 (2021). The 2014-2020 volumes will be free to access from 1 January 2021.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 188K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 3.9 (2023) Impact Factor
- Q1 Impact Factor Best Quartile
- 4.1 (2023) 5 year IF
- 8.6 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.815 (2023) SNIP
- 1.531 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 41 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 98 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 24 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 23% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Editor-in-Chief
Erik Fisher, School for the Future of Innovation in Society | Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, USA, Email: [email protected]
Founding Editor
David. H. Guston, Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University, USA
Associate Editors
Steven Flipse, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands
Armin Grunwald, ITAS, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Richard Owen, Bristol University, UK
Mario Pansera, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain
Sujatha Raman, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Barbara Ribeiro , Skena Business School, France
Mareike Smolka, Wageningen University & Research , the Netherlands, and RWTH Aachen University, Germany
Editorial Assistant
Philipp Neudert, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
Editorial Board
Wiebe Bijker, University of Maastricht, the Netherlands
Vincent Blok, Wageningen University & Research, the Netherlands
Diana Bowman , Arizona State University, USA
Sachin Chaturvedi, Research and Information System for Developing Countries, India
Shannon Conley, James Madison University, USA
Jason Delborne, North Carolina State University, USA
Conor Douglas, York University, Canada
Heather Douglas, Michigan State University, USA
Weiwen Duan, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China
Ulrike Felt, University of Vienna, Austria
Lu Gao, The Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, China
Philippe Goujon, University of Namur, Belgium
Megan Halpern, Michigan State University, USA
Jonathan Hankins, Bassetti Foundation, Italy
Sarah Hartley , University of Exeter Business School, UK
Aharon Hauptman, University of Tel Aviv, Israel
Thomas A. Hemphill, University of Michigan-Flint, USA
Rachelle Hollander, National Academy of Engineering, USA
Maja Horst, Danish Technical Univeristy (DTU), Denmark
Noela Invernizzi, Federal University of Parana, Brazil
Julian Kinderlerer, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Ralf Lindner, Fraunhofer Institut, Germany
Philip Macnaghten, Wageningen University & Research, the Netherlands
Andrew Maynard, Arizona State University, USA
Carl Mitcham, Colorado School of Mines, USA
Arie Rip, University of Twente, the Netherlands
René von Schomberg, European Commission, Belgium
Doris Schroeder, University of Central Lancashire, UK
Tsjalling Swierstra , Maastricht University, the Netherlands
Raúl Tabarés, Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Spain
Kevin Urama, African Technology Policy Studies Network, Kenya
Frank Vanclay, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Jeroen van den Hoven, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands
Simone van der Burg , Waag Futurelab, the Netherlands
Michiel van Oudheusden, University of Cambridge, UK
Kathleen Vogel , Arizona State University, USA
Tom Wang, Renmin University of China, China
Fern Wickson, The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Go Yoshizawa, Osaka University, Japan
Joy Yueyue Zhang, University of Kent, UK
Abstracting and indexing
Baidu Scholar
British Library Inside
Clarivate Analytics - Social Sciences Citation Index®
CNKI
CnpLINKer
Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DTU Findit
Electronic Journals Library (EZB)
Finnish Publication Forum (Julkaisufoorumi)
Google Scholar
JournalTOCs
Microsoft Academic
Naver Academic
Norwegian Register of Scientific Journals and Publishers
Portico
Publons
SciBase
SCOPUS
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Web of Science
Zetoc
Open access
Journal of Responsible Innovation is an open access journal and only publishes open access articles. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
To publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis. Discounts and waivers may also be available for researchers in selected countries when publishing in open access journals.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
News and offers
3 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Journal of Responsible Innovation?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Journal of Responsible Innovation.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors