About this journal
Aims and scope
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as treatment efficacy, program impacts, clinical diagnostic practices, research and evaluation designs, and outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories:
Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
Outcome-Based Program Evaluation: Evaluation practices across counseling settings, program development and process evaluations, quantitative, qualitative, and multi- or mixed-method outcome evaluations, evaluation methodology, evaluation ethics, interdisciplinary evaluations, cultural issues in program evaluations.
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Qualitative and quantitative syntheses of outcome research featuring estimations of treatment effectiveness, characteristics that moderate outcomes, and implications for public policy. Reliability and validity generalization studies.
Outcome-Based Diagnostic Practices: Reports and evaluations of diagnostic practices and processes in clinical settings, particularly in reference to differential diagnosis, dual diagnosis issues, incidence and prevalence of clinical diagnoses. Reports of broader impacts of diagnostic practices on treatment, prognosis, and well-being.
Outcome Research Design: Methodological issues in intervention research, innovative qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methodology, single subject designs, case studies exemplifying assessment and outcome research practices, statistics in assessment and outcome research, data analysis procedures, and report writing.
Outcome Measure Reviews: Critical reviews and integration of classes or groups of clinical assessment tools used as dependent variables in research studies and outcome measures in clinical practice.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 22K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 4.5 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q2 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 0.884 (2023) SNIP
- 0.424 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 31% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Joshua C. Watson, Ph.D., LPC, NCC, ACS
Professor & Chair, Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
EDITORIAL ASSISTANT
Isabel Santos
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
EDITORIAL FELLOWS
Haley Ault
University of South Florida
Adriana Labarta
Florida Atlantic University
EDITORIAL BOARD
Na Mi Bang (2023)
Indiana University
Andrew Burke (2024)
Marshall University
Rochelle Cade (2024)
Sam Houston State University
Catherine Chang (2025)
Georgia State University
Ryan Cook (2026)
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
University of Detroit Mercy
Sabina de Vries (2023)
Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Heather Delgado (2023)
Auburn University
Courtney Evans-Thompson (2026)
Liberty University
Ni Gao (2026)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jennifer Gerlach (2026)
Longwood University
Donna Gibson (2026)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Christine Gonzales-Wong (2025)
Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Jessica Gonzalez-Voller (2026)
Colorado State University
Christina Hamme Peterson (2024)
Rider University
Shaywanna Harris-Pierre (2026)
Texas State University
James P. Ikonomopoulos (2026)
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
Chi Li (2023)
The University of Memphis
W. Bradley McKibben (2024)
Jacksonville University
Rebecca McLean (2026)
Western Illinois University-Quad Cities
Patrick Mullen (2026)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Matthew Nice (2026)
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Seungbin Oh (2023)
Boston University
Danielle Pester (2026)
Auburn University
Elizabeth Prosek (2026)
The Pennsylvania State University
Corrine Sackett (2024)
Clemson University
University of Mississippi
Jyotsana Sharma (2023)
Oklahoma State University
Donna Sheperis (2024)
Palo Alto University
Jaimie Stickl Haugen (2023)
College of William & Mary
Jacqueline Swank (2026)
University of Missouri
Olivia Uwamahoro (2026)
University of West Georgia
Naomi Wheeler (2023)
Virginia Commonwealth University
AD HOC REVIEWERS
Richard S. Balkin
The University of Mississippi
Casey Barrio-Minton
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Carl J. Sheperis
Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Cassandra Storlie
Kent State University
Kelly Wester
University of North Carolina—Greensboro
Abstracting and indexing
Published in the Winter and Summer
Abstracted/Indexed in:
- National Centre for PTSD
-
OCLC
Electronic Collections Online
- Ovid
- ProQuest
ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts
- PsycINFO
- Scopus
Open access
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
2 issues per year
Associated with:
- Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development (1984 - current)
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation.
Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors