About this journal
Aims and scope
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education.
AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it.
AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
AEPR respects scholarship and research, but these alone do not constitute policy content. Policy analysis often involves educated opinion about the meanings of ideas, events, decisions, decision-making frameworks, and educational content, such as the following:
- gathering and interpreting information about simple or complex issues in order to suggest what should be done;
- taking a body of research or scholarship and exploring its ramifications;
- focusing on decisions in process or decisions already made, explaining agreement or disagreement or developing a list of potential promises and pitfalls.
Arts Education Policy Review also considers book reviews of new books which focus on policy and arts education.
Publication office: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 530 Walnut Street, Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106
Journal metrics
Usage
- 79K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 2.9 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.750 (2023) SNIP
- 0.747 (2023) SJR
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Kenneth Elpus - University of Maryland
Alexis Truitt American Alliance for Theatre and Education (AATE)
Mario R. Rossero National Art Education Association (NAEA)
Chris Woodside National Association for Music Education (NAfME)
Susan McGreevy-Nichols National Dance Education Organization (NDEO)
PAST EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Colleen Conway - University of Michigan
EDITORIAL BOARD
Carla E. Aguilar - Metropolitan State University
José Luis Aróstegui Plaza - University of Granada, Spain
Jacob Berglin- Western Michigan University
Cara Bernard - University of Connecticut
Joy Bertling - University of Tennessee-Knoxville
Tina Beveridge- George Mason University
Daniel H. Bowen - Texas A&M University
Kelly Bylica- Boston University
Ti-Wei Chen - The Education University of Hong Kong, China
Lee Cheng- Anglia Ruskin University, UK
Tara Carpenter Estrada - Brigham Young University
Crystal Davis - University of Maryland
Ali Duffy - Texas Tech University
Kevin Gormley- Dublin City University, Ireland
Erica Halverson - University of Wisconsin-Madison
Benjamin Helton- Case Western Reserve University
Ryan Hourigan - Ball State University
Aadya Kaktikar- Shiv Nadar University, India
Alexandra Kertz-Welzel - Ludwig Maximillian University, Germany
Brian Kisida - University of Missouri
Bo-Wah Leung - The Education University of Hong Kong, China
Jonathan Lilliedahl - Linnaeus University, Sweden
Mary McAvoy - Arizona State University
David S. Miller- University of Kentucky
Stephanie Milling - University of South Carolina
Marissa Nesbit - University of North Carolina Charlotte
Chell Parkins- University of Wisconsin–Madison
Louisa Penfold- Harvard University
David Potter - University of Wisconsin – Superior
Ryan Shaw - Michigan State University
Eric Shieh - Metropolitan Expeditionary Learning School
Andrea VanDeusen - East Carolina University
Amanda Wager - Vancouver Island University, Canada
Ethan Yazzie-Mintz - First Light Education Project
Abstracting and indexing
Arts Education Policy Review is Abstracted & Indexed in:
• De Gruyter Saur
° Dietrich's Index Philosophicus
° IBZ - Internationale Bibliographie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenliteratur
° Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur
• EBSCOhost
° Current Abstracts
° Education Abstracts (H.W. Wilson)
° Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
° Education Source
° Music Index
° Public Affairs Index
° OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson)
° Public Affairs Index
° Readers' Guide Full Text Select (Online)
° TOC Premier (Table of Contents)
• Elsevier BV
° Scopus
• ERIC (Education Resources Information Center)
• Gale
° Advanced Placement Fine Arts and Music
° Biography in Context
° Expanded Academic ASAP
° Fine Arts and Music Collection
° General Reference Center
° InfoTrac Custom
° InfoTrac Student Edition
° MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association)
° Professional Collection
• Magazine Index Plus
• Ovid
• Periodica Islamica
• ProQuest
° Arts Premium Collection
° Education Collection
° Education Database
° International Index to Music Periodicals (IIMP)
° International Index to the Performing Arts (IIPA)
° Professional ProQuest Central
° ProQuest 5000
° ProQuest 5000 International
° ProQuest Central
° ProQuest Professional Education
° Research Library
° Social Science Premium Collection
• Taylor & Francis
° Educational Research Abstracts Online
° Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts (Online)
Open access
Arts Education Policy Review is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
News and offers
- Special subscription rate of US$55 for members of Arts USA, AATE, NAfME, NAEA, NDEO & National Guild for Community Arts Education.
Society information
Members of the following groups can receive an individual print and online subscription to Arts Education Policy Review at a special society member rate. Please see the pricing or subscribe page for details.
- Americans for the Arts
- American Alliance for Theatre & Education
- National Association for Music Education
- National Art Education Association
- National Dance Education Organization
- National Guild for Community Arts Education
4 issues per year
Currently known as:
- Arts Education Policy Review (1992 - current)
Formerly known as
- Design For Arts in Education (1977 - 1992)
- Design (1899 - 1977)
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Arts Education Policy Review?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Arts Education Policy Review.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors