Single vs. double dartos layers for preventing fistula in a tubularised incised-plate repair of distal hypospadias

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome of a single vs. a double-layer dartos interposition for preventing a fistula after tubularised incised-plate (TIP) distal hypospadias repair.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with primary distal hypospadias who had the hypospadias repaired between February 2009 and June 2011, operated by one surgeon (S.A.K.). In all of the children a standard TIP urethroplasty was performed, which was covered by a dartos fascial flap fashioned using one of two techniques, i.e. in Group I (48 patients) double dartos preputial flaps were used, and in Group II (52 patients) a single dorsal dartos flap was used and transposed ventrally via a ‘buttonhole’. The fistula rate and other complications related to each group were recorded.

Results: The mean (range) follow-up was 12 (6–22) months for Group I and 14 (6–24) months for Group II. The result was considered a success in 96% of Group I and 92% of Group II. In Group I there were no fistulae, while in Group II there were four fistulae (8%) detected; this difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.1). Meatal stenosis was associated with a fistula in one patient in Group II but not in the other three. In Group I a meatal stenosis developed late after complete healing of the urethroplasty, with no associated fistula. The repair broke down in one patient in Group I (2%).

Conclusion: A double-dartos neourethral cover in TIP hypospadias repair seems to be more effective than a single layer for preventing a fistula, despite there being no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, the protective effect of double-dartos flaps must be appropriately evaluated in a prospective, randomised and controlled study in more patients.

Keywords:

• Neourethral cover
• Dartos fascia
• TIP urethroplasty
• Outcome

Abbreviation:

• TIP
• tubularised incised-plate

Notes

Peer review under responsibility of Arab Association of Urology.