Caffeine and oocyte vitrification: Sheep as an animal model

Peer review under responsibility of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University.

Abstract

Oocyte cryopreservation is valuable way of preserving the female germ line. Vitrification of immature ovine oocytes decreased the levels of both maturation promoting factor (MPF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in metaphase II (MII) oocytes after IVM. Our aims were 1) to evaluate the effects of vitrification of ovine GV-oocytes on spindle assembly, MPF/MAP kinases activities, and preimplantation development following IVM and IVF, 2) to elucidate the impact of caffeine supplementation during IVM on the quality and development of vitrified/warmed ovine GV-oocytes. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) from mature ewes were divided into vitrified, toxicity and control groups. Oocytes from each group were matured in vitro for 18 h in caffeine free IVM medium and denuded oocytes were incubated in maturation medium supplemented with 10 mM (+) or without (−) caffeine for another 6 h. At 24 h.p.m., oocytes were evaluated for spindle configuration, MPF/MAP kinases activities or fertilized and cultured in vitro for 7 days. Caffeine supplementation did not significantly affect the percentages of oocytes with normal spindle assembly in all the groups. Caffeine supplementation during IVM did not increase the activities of both kinases in vitrified groups. Cleavage and blastocyst development were significantly lower in vitrified groups than in control. Caffeine supplementation during the last 6 h of IVM did not significantly improve the cleavage and blastocyst rates in vitrified group. In conclusion, caffeine treatment during in vitro maturation has no positive impact on the quality and development of vitrified/warmed ovine GV-oocytes after IVM/IVF and embryo culture.

Keywords:

• Caffeine
• GV
• MPF/MAPK
• Oocytes
• Ovine
• Vitrification

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Scholarship from Ministry of Higher Education, Egypt to A.R.M. This work was performed in the Division of Animal Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Notes

Peer review under responsibility of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University.