Among numerous definitions of natural risks, this article examines the most widespread. Only three definitions attract attention: the first idea was given by Diderot and d'Alembert in French "Encyclopédie" between 1751 and 1772 A.D.; later the jurists described act of God as unforeseeable and compelling. Nowadays UNESCO definition says that natural risk is the crossing between natural hazard and vulnerability. Definitions given by dictionnary or insurance companies are either inadequate or morally unacceptable and they must be forgotten. Furthermore, the three remembered definitions fulfil the same fields: foreseeability/forecast, foretelling/prediction and prevention. In addition, this article points out the role of historical studies in the learning process of natural hazards and vulnerabilities.
Free access
Sur plusieurs définitions du risque, et leurs conséquences en matière de prévision, prédiction et prévention
About some definitions of risk and its consequences on the forecasting, prediction and prevention
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.