3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Reports

Choice of Protection Devices in Carotid Angioplasty Two Case Reports

, &
Pages 357-360 | Published online: 14 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Patient selection is of the utmost importance with all endovascular procedures. It is equally important to select the appropriate protection device during carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS).

CAS in two patients was unsuccessful due to the chosen protection device. Occlusion of the external carotid artery while deploying a Parodi Anti-Embolic-System Device (PAeC®-ArteriA) resulted in cerebral ischaemia. Conversion to the Angioguard® System (Cordis) made carotid angioplasty possible, but was complicated by thrombosis of the filter. In the second case it was impossible to negotiate tortuous vessels with the Angioguard® system.

Our experience illustrates that both devices have limitations. Choosing the wrong device may have serious consequences.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

T. Hendrickx

T. Hendrickx Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Residential Village-3, Barnes House Bovemoors Lane Exeter EX2 5DS united Kingdom

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.