Abstract
As the world population ages, the prevalence of osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fractures will increase dramatically, being responsible for an increase of the health expenditure. On the other hand, there is the inescapable fact of scarcity creating the necessity of making difficult choices with regard to the allocation of human resources. So the question remains: should we carry on investing an important part of our health expenditure for the treatment of hip fractures in elderly people?
To answer this statement, we compared 384 hip fracture patients of 70 years and older treated in our department between 1978 and 1983 with 1102 patients treated between 1998 and 2003. Both groups had a prospective follow-up of at least one year. There were no statistically significant differences: mortality rate 24% vs. 23%; good functional outcome 82% vs. 73%; and home going rate 60% vs. 66%. The factors influencing these results were studied. So we can conclude:
-The number of hip fractures treated nowadays has increased compared with twenty years ago;
-There is no significant improvement in mortality, nor in quality of life;
-Age is not a contraindication for hip fracture surgery.
Key Words:
Additional information
Notes on contributors
J. Fierens
J. Fierens UZ Gasthuisberg B-Leuven, Belgium E-mail: [email protected]