194
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in the intraoperative diagnosis of iatrogenic ureteral injury

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 261-266 | Received 28 Feb 2020, Accepted 31 Mar 2020, Published online: 16 Apr 2020
 

Abstract

Background

Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a rare but feared complication in pelvic surgery. Prophylactic ureteral catheterization (PUC) is inconsistently used to reduce this risk, however no strong evidence exists for this practice. The objective is to investigate whether prophylactic ureteral catheterization can enhance intraoperative detection of IUI and reduce associated patient morbidity.

Methods

The database of our tertiary referral hospital was retrospectively queried for ureter repairs due to iatrogenic injuries. The search yielded 845 unique patient files. After application of exclusion criteria and manual review of files, 155 individual cases remained. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters: timing of ureteral injury discovery, duration until catheter removal and postoperative complications.

Results

Prophylactic ureteral catheterization was able to significantly enhance intraoperative diagnosis of IUI (OR = 5.09; 95%CI = 2.26–11.48). The number needed to treat is 2.6 patients. Furthermore, when the IUI was diagnosed during surgery, a significant reduction in postoperative complications was observed (RR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.42–0.98).

Conclusion

Although the beneficial effects of PUC on IUI incidence remain controversial, when a ureteral injury occurs during pelvic surgery, the presence of prophylactic ureteral catheters can significantly reduce both diagnostic delay and postoperative morbidity. By promoting an immediate repair, ureteral catheterization reduces need for further diagnostics and secondary interventions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would thank Ahmed M. Chaoui, M.D., for his contribution in the study design.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval is waived for retrospective studies by the IRB of University Hospitals Leuven.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.