Abstract
Background. The search continues for a safe, effective, and cheap method for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Misoprostol is a strong contender in this respect. The dose schedule of misoprostol is still not fixed. The objective of our present study was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of 2 dose regimens of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination. Method. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was undertaken in 138 women at 14–20 weeks gestation, in a teaching hospital. Subjects were randomised to receive either regime A: 400 µg of intravaginal misoprostol every 3 h, or regime B: loading dose of 600 µg, followed by 200 µg every 3 h. The main outcome measure was the success rate at 48 h, total dose required, induction-abortion interval, and adverse events. Data was analysed by Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, using Statistica 6.0 software. Results. There was no significant difference in the success rates at 24 and 48 h (Regime A: 97.18 and 98.59%; Regime B: 95.45 and 95.45%), and in mean induction-abortion interval (12.97 versus 12.13 h). However, mean misoprostol requirement was significantly higher for Regime A (1701.4 versus 1269.7 µg). The incidence of fever was significantly less in Regime B (32.4 versus 14.9%). Conclusion. Use of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester abortion had comparable efficacy with less drug requirement for the 600 µg loading dose followed by 200 µg 3-hourly regime compared to the 400 µg 3-hourly regime.
| Acronyms | ||
| Po | = | parity zero |
| P1 | = | parity one |
| S | = | significant |
| NS | = | not significant |
| HS | = | highly significant |
| Acronyms | ||
| Po | = | parity zero |
| P1 | = | parity one |
| S | = | significant |
| NS | = | not significant |
| HS | = | highly significant |