![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to identify the risk factors of external root resorption (ERR) on second molar (M2) due to presence of impacted third (M3) molar based on cone- beam computerised tomography (CBCT) findings.
Material and methods
Search of PubMed via MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Experta Medical dataBASE (EMBASE) was performed to identify studies assessing the risk factors of ERR in M2 due to the presence of impacted M3.
Results
M2 in close proximity to mesio-angular impacted M3 had 50% higher risk of root resorption than with vertical impacted M3 (RR 0.50 95% CI [0.35, 0.73], p = .0003). Presence of the impacted M3 in the lower arch with ERR in M2 was higher (38.3%) than in the upper arch (33.8%). With respect to the inclination of impacted M3, the incidence of ERR was higher with transverse, horizontal and mesio-angular impacted M3 with 54.5%, 47.5% and 44.5% of occurrence, respectively.
Conclusion
ERR in M2 was significantly affected by the contact with impacted M3 and most importantly, the inclination of M3. The presence of mesio-angular, horizontal or transverse impacted M3 in close proximity to apical or middle portion of M2 could possibly be a strong risk factor for ERR in M2.
Author contribution
YM conceived and designed the study; YM and DM were involved in literature search and data collection; YM and DM analysed the data; XL wrote the paper; and XL reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
