87
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Is dissection of levels 4 and 5 justified for cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer?

, , , , &
Pages 1202-1206 | Received 10 Dec 2006, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Conclusion. Dissecting levels 2 and 3 and sparing the dissection of level 4 and the contralateral neck when frozen section results are negative are reasonable options for the selective dissection of cN0necks. Our findings show that dissection of level 5 is considered unnecessary, unless there is overt metastasis. Objective. The level of node involvement and recurrence rates were assessed in cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients in order to develop appropriate guidelines for the treatment of the neck. Materials and methods. A total of 328 cN0necks operated with selective dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were monitored for at least 24months and regional recurrences were evaluated. Results. The prevalence of level 4occult metastases was 3.4%; 1.5% of them were isolated to level 4. We observed regional recurrence in 5.6% of the necks. No case of metastasis or regional relapse was observed in level 5.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.