SUMMARY
Doke's work is criticised for occasionally lacking, among other things, principled and rigorous phonological and grammatical theories. Nevertheless, certain things stand clearly to his credit: firstly, his ability to observe, record, analyse and describe fairly accurately the data with which he worked; and, secondly, his boldness in breaking away from the grip of European grammatical tradition and devising a model suitable to some extent at that time for Bantu languages.