Abstract
There are two principal approaches to the 8-hour carbon monoxide standard: (1) 8-hour moving averages that culminate with every clock hour, and (2) nonoverlapping averages for consecutive 8-hour intervals. Examination of 1972 data for three example sites (Newark, NJ, Camden, NJ, and Spokane, WA) shows that the maximum and the “second high” control values derived from moving averages can be at least 20% higher than corresponding values detected by the consecutive 8-hour intervals. The natural fluctuation in the time of day when the maximum occurs and the variability in episode length make it doubtful that any framework of consecutive 8-hour intervals can adequately portray the essential characteristics of CO exposure. Prudence recommends choice of the moving 8-hour average as more sensitive to actual maximum levels and to short episodes, more faithful to the body’s integrating response to CO exposure, and more equitable in presenting comparisons among stations with differing patterns of daily variation.