6
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Is the 24-Hour Urine Sample a Fallacy?

&
Pages 456-460 | Published online: 27 Dec 2007
 

Abstract

A study has been made of the use of 24-hour excretion (actual or projected) in comparison with the concentrations adjusted for specific gravity, as measures of exposure to lead, mercury, benzene, and trichloroethylene. It has been found that timed samples show a somewhat greater variation than values adjusted for specific gravity. When different individuals are considered, differences in body size affect the rate of excretion, as indicated by timed samples, to a certain extent. Other factors, however, appear to be of greater importance. The evidence presented, although not conclusive, suggests that the value adjusted for specific gravity is a better index of exposure than is the timed sample.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.