45
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pharmaceutical analysis

Reversed–Phase Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Zaleplon in Human Plasma and its Pharmacokinetic Application

, &
Pages 1891-1905 | Received 07 Dec 2005, Accepted 26 Feb 2006, Published online: 08 Jun 2007
 

Abstract

A simple, rapid, specific, and reliable high performance liquid chromatographic assay of zaleplon in human plasma has been developed. Reversed‐phase chromatography was conducted using a mobile phase of methanol∶ammonium acetate buffer (50∶50) v/v, pH 3.2 adjusted with orthophosphoric acid, UV detection at 232 nm. After extraction from plasma by precipitation the drug was chromatographed using a C18 reversed‐phase analytical column. The average recoveries of zaleplon from spiked plasma in the concentration range from 0.005–0.2 µg/ml were 93.29%, and their respective CV% was 2.557%. Regression analysis for the calibration plot for plasma standards obtained on three different days for the drug concentrations between 0.005–0.2 µg/ml indicated excellent linearity (r>0.999) and the coefficient of variation of the slopes of the three lines was less than 2%. The limit of detection was 5 ng/ml. Analysis of variance of the data showed no detectable difference in the slopes of the three standard plots (F=3.1, P>0.01). The high correlation coefficients and the similarities in the slopes are good indications of the excellent reproducibility and linearity of the proposed method. The proposed method was applied to study the bioequivalence of a commercial product of zaleplon, using as reference standard the innovator drug product. The study was conducted by using one capsule (1×10 mg) of each of the commercial product and the reference standard in a two‐way open randomized crossover design involving 24 volunteers. The criteria used to assess bioequivalence of the products were AUC (0−∞), Cmax, tmax, t1/2, and K. The obtained values for these parameters were 0.246±0.03 µg h/ml, 0.150±0.013 µg/ml, 1 h, 1.26±0.36 h, and 0.5928±0.1732 h−1 for product A whereas, for product B they were 0.256±0.044 µgh/ml, 0.142±0.014 µg/ml, 1 h, 1.18±0.33 h, and 0.63±0.1747 h−1, respectively.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.