The scientific journal. Authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

1 Alex Csiszar, ‘Peer Review: Troubled from the Start’, Nature, 532 (2016), 306–8. Roberto Lalli, ‘“Dirty Work”, But Someone Has to Do it: Howard P. Robertson and the Refereeing Practices of “Physical Review” in the 1930s’, Notes and Records, 70 (2016), 151–74. Noah Moxham, Aileen Fyfe, ‘The Royal Society and the Prehistory of Peer Review, 1665–1965’, Historical Journal, 61 (2018), 863–89. Melinda Baldwin, ‘Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States’, Isis, 109 (2018), 538–58.

2 David Kronick, A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technical Press, 1665–1790, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1976.

3 A. J. Meadows, Communication in Science, London: Butterworths, 1974, p. 66.