![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
Notes
1John North, 'Aristotle's Empiricism', Early Science and Medicine, 10 (2005), 91-97, quoting and translating L.M. de Rijk, De Rol van de Taal in het Empirisme van Aristoteles (384-322 v. Chr.) (Amsterdam, 2004), 26.
2Aristotle, Physics, II.1, 193b13.
3Aristotle, Physics, II.1, 193b19.
4Virgil, neid, VI: 724-27: 'Principio caelum ac terras camposque liquentis / lucentemque globum lunae Titaniaque astra / spiritus intus alit, totamque infusa per artus/ mens agitat molem et magno se corpore miscet'.
5Incidentally, Hirai's point that 'c'est la thorie scolastique des minima naturalia qui est applique ces particules minimes' (p. 74) is somewhat inaccurate: the scholastics' 'minima naturalia' have no independent existence, whereas Fracastoro's infected particles do.
6This important text is now available in English translation, see John M. Forrester, Jean Fernel's On the Hidden Causes of Things. Forms, Souls, and Occult Diseases in Renaissance Medicine. With an edition and translation of Fernel's De abditis rerum causis by J. M. Forrester and an introduction and annotations by John Henry and J. M. Forrester (Leiden, 2005).
7For the concluding part of Hirai's story, concerning the atomist Gassendi, it is not unimportant to know that Agricola's description of the generation of minerals out of mud relies on small earthen particles being glued together (conglutinatio) by means of a type of fatty humour. On the history of corpuscular description of cohesion, see Gad Freudenthal, 'The Problem of Cohesion between Alchemy and Natural Philosophy: From Unctuous Moisture to Phlogiston', in Alchemy Revisited, edited by Z.R.W.M. von Martels (Leiden, 1990), 107-16.
8Daniel Sennert, De chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu (Wittenberg, 1619), chapter 12 ('De generatione et mixtione'):
generationem nihil aliud esse, quam progressionem seminum e suis fontibus, abyssis, et vitalibus principiis in hanc mundanam scenam, qua ex invisibilibus visibilia fiant, et colores, sapores, odores; caliditatem, frigiditatem, humiditatem, siccitatem, magnitudines, situs, conformationes & omnium corporum ornamenta producant, et hoc modo individuorum renovatione specierum perpetuitatem custodiant ... . Formae et semina rerum naturalium non latent in abyssis.
9See O.R. Bloch, La philosophie de Gassendi (The Hague, 1971), 233-78; Norma E. Emerton, The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, 1984), 108-10; 136-39.
12Pierre Gassendi, 'De temperie et valetudine animalium', II, in Syntagma philosophicum, II: 558b-559a.
10Gassendi, 'De plantis', IV, in Syntagma philosophicum, II, 172b, in Opera omnia, 6 vols (Lyon, 1658; repr. Stuttgart, 1964).
11Margaret J. Osler, 'How Mechanical Was the Mechanical Philosophy? Non-Epicurean Themes in Gassendi's Atomism', in Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, edited by C.H. Lthy, J.E. Murdoch and W.R. Newman (Leiden, 2001), 423-39.
13Rare and therefore precious discussions of this topic are: Jole Shackelford, 'Seeds with a Mechanical Purpose: Severinus' Semina and Seventeenth-Century Matter Theory', in Reading the Book of Nature. The Other Side of the Scientific Revolution, edited by A.G. Debus and M.T. Walton (Kirksville, MO, 1998), 15-44; and Marco Messeri, Causa e spiegazione. La fisica di Pierre Gassendi (Milan, 1985), ch. 7: 'I semi delle cose'.
14See Antonio Clericuzio, Elements, Principles and Corpuscles. A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century (Dordrecht, 2002); William R. Newman, Atoms and Alchemy: Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution (Chicago, 2006).
15Indeed, some of Hirai's extensive paraphrases of rare texts lead the reader astray, and his detailed, albeit always gentle rebuttals of previous authors still bear the mark of the dissertation as which this book began. One would, for example, have accepted his text-based exegesis of Gassendi's chemical thought without knowing exactly how and why it differs from Olivier Bloch's.