Serodiagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in Portugal: comparison of three methods

Abstract

Sera collected in Portugal from 43 dogs were screened for specific antibodies to Leishmania donovani antigens. Three different techniques were compared: an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a competitive-ELISA (C-ELISA) using two species-specific monoclonal antibodies, D2 and D13. By IFA, 22 of the sera examined showed positive reactions, compared with 26 by ELISA or 27 by C-ELISA. There was no direct correlation observed between the serum titre by IFA and the strength of the reaction in ELISA or inhibition in C-ELISA. However, a good correlation was observed between sera identified as positive (95·5%) by all three techniques. Western blotting on leishmanial membranes showed that common antigens with M_r of 26 000 and 70–84 000 were recognized by all infected dog sera, regardless of the serum titre. In large scale studies, ELISAs are preferred to IFA for the rapid diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis because of their greater simplicity.