A comparative study of experimental caecal amoebiasis and the evaluation of amoebicides

Abstract

Caecal amoebiasis models (mouse, hamster and rat) were compared for amoebic infection and chemotherapeutic evaluation using a pathogenic strain of Entamoeba histolytica of human origin. Caecal infection in the hamster was of the acute type, with a large number of amoebae in the caecal tissue, whereas the amoebae in rats were seen in the lumen, on the mucosal surface. Amoebic lesions in the mouse caecum were of moderate severity. The mouse model responded to both metronidazole (tissue amoebicide) and diloxanide furoate (luminal amoebicide), whereas the hamster model only responded well to metronidazole and the rat model only to diloxanide furoate. Using the mouse as a primary screening model, a new oxadiazole compound, BTI 2405^E, was found to have tissue and luminal amoebicidal activity. In rodent caecal models, a single dose of BTI 2405^E was found to be more effective than one of metronidazole or diloxanide furoate. The mouse model appears to be the most useful for primary screening of anti-amoebic compounds.