![Sample our Mathematics & Statistics journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5943/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Mathematics-Statistics.jpg"})
Abstract
In 1926 Lavrentiev gave an example of a free problem in the calculus of variations for which the infimum over the class of functions in satisfying prescribed endpoint conditions was strictly less than the infimum over the dense subset
of admissible functions in
. This property is now referred to as the Lavrentiev phenomenon. After Lavrentiev’s discovery, Tonelli and Mania gave sufficient conditions under which this phenomenon does not arise. After these results, the study of the Lavrentiev phenomenon lay dormant until the 1980s when a series of papers by Ball and Mizel and by Clarke and Vinter gave a number of new examples for which the Lavrentiev phenomenon occurred. Also in 1979, Angell showed that the Lavrentiev phenomenon did not occur if the integrands satisfy a certain analytic property known as property (D). Moreover, he showed that the conditions of Tonelli and Mania insured that the analytic property (D) was satisfied. Since Angell’s result there have been several papers that have discussed the nonoccurence of the Lavrentiev phenomenon for free problems in the calculus of variations. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First to present a general approach to the proofs of these later papers which unifies the results, and second to show that the extra conditions imposed on the integrands insure property (D) holds with respect to the relevant sequence.
Notes
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.