115
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The nested collective lottery that maximizes welfare under consumption interdependence

&
Pages 1863-1866 | Published online: 01 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

We develop a generalized lottery mechanism in this article that allows people to choose to succeed separately while retaining both merits (fairness and options to succeed jointly) of the collective lottery developed by Chen et al. (2010). We use the rationing of hunting permits in the US and Canada as examples to show the applicability of this generalized lottery mechanism.

JEL Classification::

Notes

1 If some persons cannot be included in a box, we refer to them as the outsiders. There are (N - SV) persons who cannot be put into any boxes, and there are (W - KV) goods that will be distributed.

2 Being separate (in different nests) or together (in the same box) is based on the applicants’ preferences. However, it can also be based on the authority's preference, too. For example, the military authorities can place applicants with certain skills/body conditions into different nests to ensure that they recruit a combination of men that the authority wants.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.