ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to provide a direct estimate of the degree of persistence of measures of nominal and real house prices for the US economy, covering the longest possible annual sample of data, namely 1830–2013. The estimation of the degree of persistence accommodates for non-linear (deterministic) trends using Chebyshev polynomials in time. In general, the results show a high degree of persistence in the series along with a component of non-linear behaviour. In general, if we assume uncorrelated errors, non-linearities are observed in both nominal and real prices, but this hypothesis is rejected in favour of linear models for the log-transformation of the data. However, if autocorrelated errors are permitted, non-linearities are observed in all cases, and mean reversion is found in the case of logged prices, though given the wide confidence intervals, the unit root null hypothesis cannot be rejected in these cases.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank two anonymous referees for many helpful comments. The helpful comments of the editor and two reviewers are also much appreciated. However, any remaining errors are solely ours.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.
Notes
1 Further details regarding the dates of structural breaks for the nominal and real house price indices have been discussed in the data segment of the paper.
2 Additional studies on this topic are that of Abraham and Hendershott (Citation1996), Meese and Wallace (Citation1994), Englund and Ioannides (Citation1997), Malpezzi (Citation1999), Meen (Citation2002), Capozza et al. (Citation2002, Citation2004), Gao, Lin, and Na (Citation2009), Mikhed and Zemcik (Citation2009), Beracha and Skiba (Citation2011), Lean and Smyth (Citation2013), André, Gil-Alana, and Gupta (Citation2014), Gil-Alana, Barros, and Peypoch (Citation2014), Gil-Alana, Barros, and Peypoch (Citation2014) and Gupta and Majumdar (Citation2015), among others.
3 An I(0) process is defined as a covariance stationary process with a spectral density function that is positive and finite at the long-run or zero frequency.
4 These conditions only include moments up to a second order.
6 EViews and FORTRAN are used to conduct all the empirical analyses, and the codes are available upon request from the authors.
7 Further details of these tests are available upon request from the authors.
Abraham, J. M., and P. H. Hendershott. 1996. “Bubbles in Metropolitan Housing Markets.” Journal of Housing Research 7: 191–207. Meese, R., and N. Wallace. 1994. “Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco?” Journal of Urban Economics 35: 245–266. doi:10.1006/juec.1994.1015. Englund, P., and Y. M. Ioannides. 1997. “House Price Dynamics: An International Empirical Perspective.” Journal of Housing Economics 6: 119–136. doi:10.1006/jhec.1997.0210. Malpezzi, S. 1999. “A Simple Error Correction Model of House Prices.” Journal of Housing Economics 8: 27–62. doi:10.1006/jhec.1999.0240. Meen, G. 2002. “The Time-Series Behavior of House Prices: A Transatlantic Divide?” Journal of Housing Economics 11: 1–23. doi:10.1006/jhec.2001.0307. Capozza, D., P. Hendershott, C. Mack, and C. Mayer. 2002. Determinants of Real House Price Dynamics. NBER Working Paper 9262. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Capozza, D. R., P. H. Hendershott, and C. Mack. 2004. “An Anatomy of Price Dynamics in Illiquid Markets: Analysis and Evidence from Local Housing Markets.” Real Estate Economics 32: 1–32. doi:10.1111/reec.2004.32.issue-1. Gao, A., Z. Lin, and C. F. Na. 2009. “Housing Market Dynamics: Evidence of Mean Reversion and Downward Rigidity.” Journal of Housing Economics 18: 256–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2009.07.003. Mikhed, V., and P. Zemcik. 2009. “Do House Prices Reflect Fundamentals? Aggregate and Panel Data Evidence.” Journal of Housing Economics 18: 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2009.03.001. Beracha, E., and H. Skiba. 2011. “Momentum in Residential Real Estate.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 43: 299–320. doi:10.1007/s11146-009-9210-2. Lean, H. H., and R. Smyth. 2013. “Do Malaysian House Prices Follow a Random Walk? Evidence from Univariate and Panel LM Unit Root Tests with One and Two Structural Breaks.” Applied Economics 45: 2611–2627. doi:10.1080/00036846.2012.674207. André, C., L. A. Gil-Alana, and R. Gupta. 2014. “Testing for Persistence in Housing Price-to-Income and Price-to-Rent Ratios in 16 OECD Countries.” Applied Economics 46: 2127–2138. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.896988. Gil-Alana, L. A., C. Barros, and N. Peypoch. 2014. “Long Memory and Fractional Integration in the Housing Price Series of London and Paris.” Applied Economics 46: 3377–3388. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.929630. Gil-Alana, L. A., C. Barros, and N. Peypoch. 2014. “Long Memory and Fractional Integration in the Housing Price Series of London and Paris.” Applied Economics 46: 3377–3388. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.929630. Gupta, R., and A. Majumdar. 2015. “Forecasting US Real House Price Returns over 1831–2013: Evidence from Copula Models.” Applied Economics 47: 5204–5213. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1044648. Cuestas, J. C., and L. A. Gil-Alana. 2015. “Testing for Long Memory in the Presence of Non-linear Deterministic Trends with Chebyshev Polynomials.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. doi:10.1515/snde-2014-0005. Gil-Alana, L. A. 2004. “The Use of Bloomfield (1973) Model as an Approximation to ARMA Processes in the Context of Fractional Integration.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 39: 429–436. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(04)90515-8. Additional information
Funding
Luis A. Gil-Alana gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [ECO2014-55236]. Fernando Perez de Gracia also acknowledges the financial support from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [ECO2014-55496].