126
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A note on the surface topography of profiled wood decking

&
Pages 147-152 | Received 07 Jul 2015, Accepted 09 Nov 2015, Published online: 19 Jan 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Profiled wooden deck-boards with small peaks and grooves machined into their surface are preferred in many countries to flat deck-boards because profiling makes the surface less slippery and prone to checking. Numerous companies manufacture profiled decking, and in this paper we examine the variation in topography of profiled wood decking. The topography of commercial profiled decking used in seven different countries was quantified using confocal profilometry, and principal components analysis was used to explore variability in topography between profiled decking samples and relationships between them. Confocal profilometry was able to measure the topography of profiled decking. We observed large variation in the height and width of profile peaks and also their peak and groove radii. Profiled decking can be classified into three morphological groups using the ratio of radii of surface grooves to those of peaks. Two of these groups, ribbed and rippled decking have been mentioned previously, but we identify and name a third group (ribble profile) with surface topography that lies between those of ribbed and rippled profiles. Our method of classifying profiles makes it possible to identify different types of profiled decking and provides a way of systematically comparing how profile topography influences the ability of profiles to restrict the checking of wood.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr Ferry Bongers, Mr Dallin Brooks, Dr Paul Morris, Dr Makoto Kiguchi and Mr Alan Smart for giving us profiled deck-board samples, National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) for partial funding and Drs Alan Preston and Paul Morris for moral support. PDE thanks Viance, Tolko, and FPInnovations for their support of his BC Leadership Chair at the University of British Columbia. None of these organisations were involved in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data or the writing of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.