Abstract
This paper addresses the controversy that has arisen over the appropriateness of trying to train students to become practising psychologists within 4 years of non-specialised tertiary study. Pressures external to the discipline of psychology have forced a reconsideration of training and credentials for professional psychologists. Pressures include market forces and a large and sudden increase in the number of psychology courses available in Australian universities. This paper briefly describes the scientist-practitioner model and the current routes to becoming a professional psychologist. In particular the role of the 4th year in professional training is examined by comparing the honours degree with a 4-year pass degree/diploma. The educational resources and professional implications of attempting to train practising psychologists solely within 4 years are described. Finally, it is argued that in order to fulfil the requirements of the scientist-practitioner model, a significant research experience in either an applied or basic field should be retained and that to achieve a professional qualification within 4 years would require the present degree structure to change from non-specialist to specialist.