Abstract
Capsule Density of Corncrakes is greater in areas of positively managed non‐crop cover vegetation which occur alongside fields managed to enhance breeding success.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many thanks to James How, Tom Epps, Craig Archibald, Cath Fotheringham, Michael Coppleston, Michael Sur, Eion Brown, Andy Schofield, Dr Patrick Doncaster and John Jones. Many thanks to two reviewers, whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript.
Notes
a. Number and density of Corncrakes was calculated from the number of birds found across the entire area of each farm and the entire area of cover and silage habitat within each farm (Table ).
b. Differences in June density in cover habitat across farms were not found to be significant (χ2 = 3.0, P = 2.0), while differences in silage habitat across farms and differences across farms irrespective of habitat type were found to be highly significant (χ2 = 90.0, P = 0.001 and χ2 = 32.9, P = 0.001, respectively). Differences in June sward height in cover habitat across farms (χ2 = 18.6), in silage habitat across farms (χ2 = 93.8) and across farms irrespective of habitat type (χ2 = 73.1) were all found to be highly significant (P = 0.001). Differences in August density across farms (χ2 = 17.7) and sward height across farms (χ2 = 15.5) were also found to be highly significant (P = 0.001).
c. Significant differences between farms in mean percentage cover of several species were identified by Friedman’s test: June and August cover areas of U. dioica, (χ2 = 21.3, P = 0.001 and χ2 = 10.2, P = 0.006, respectively); Heracleum spp. (χ2 = 10.8, P = 0.005 and χ2 = 8.9, P = 0.012, respectively), Phalaris spp. (χ2 = 18.0, P = 0.001 and χ2 = 18.5, P = 0.001), Cynaeae spp. (χ2 = 7.28, P = 0.026 and χ2 = 17.6, P = 0.001) and of Juncus spp. August cover and silage (χ2 = 7.4, P = 0.025 and χ2 = 14.9, P = 0.001, respectively).