129
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Selection responses in duration of fertility and its consequences on hatchability in the intergeneric crossbreeding of ducks

, , , , &
Pages 565-571 | Accepted 24 May 2005, Published online: 21 Aug 2006
 

Abstract

1.

From 1992 to 2003, selected (S) and control lines (C) of the laying Brown Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhynchos) were simultaneously maintained under the same standardised conditions of feeding and management.

2.

The selection objective was to increase the number of fertile eggs after a single artificial insemination (AI) with pooled Muscovy semen. From generations G1 to G11, 2452 and 2022 female ducks, in S and C lines, respectively, were measured and recorded. In the S line, the percentage selected varied between 20·2 and 34·3% in females and between 7·2 and 20·8% in males.

3.

Selection for number of fertile eggs had a correlated effect of increasing the parameter τ of the logistic curves which fitted the daily variations (d 2 to 15) in fertility or hatchability on the basis of eggs set. The differences S − C for the estimates of the times of half maximal fertility and hatchability increased by 0·41 and 0·37 d per generation between G1 and G11, respectively.

4.

The highest increases of fertility per day rates after a single AI were observed between d 5 and 11. Moreover, in the selected line, fertility rate was higher than, or equal to, 90% in d 2 from G8. The same tendencies were observed for the changes in the evolution of hatchability on the basis of eggs set.

5.

Selection increased fertility and hatchability according to the egg set rates, especially for d 2 to 8 after AI. Hatchability of fertile eggs was not impaired, confirming that selection for one AI per week was possible in this strain of laying ducks.

Acknowledgements

The selection experiment was started in 1992 and carried out as a cooperative research programme between the Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture (LRI-COA) and the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station d’Amélioration Génétique des Animaux du Département de Génétique Animale (INRA-SAGA). We would like to thank all staff at LRI-COA and INRA-SAGA for their help in carrying out this research, and the National Science Council (NSC81-0409-B-061-504; NSC82-0409-B-061-016; NSC84-2321-B-061-004; NSC85-2321-B-061-002; NSC86-2321-B-061-005) and LRI-COA for their financial support.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.