502
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Behaviour, Welfare, Husbandry & Environment

Evaluation of the performance of different cleaning treatments in reducing microbial contamination of poultry transport crates

, , , , , & show all
Pages 233-240 | Accepted 27 Jan 2008, Published online: 17 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

1. The present systems for cleaning the plastic crates (drawers) used to transport live poultry to the processing plant are known to be inadequate for removing microbial contamination.

2. To investigate possible improvements, a mobile experimental rig was constructed and operated in the lairage of a poultry processing plant. The cleaning rig could simulate the conditions of commercial cleaning systems and utilise freshly emptied crates from the processing plant.

3. The aim of the study was to improve cleaning by enhancing the removal of adherent organic material on the crates and by reducing microbial contamination by at least 4 log10 units.

4. Trials showed that the most effective treatments against Campylobacter were either (a) the combination of soaking at 55°C, brushing for 90 s, washing for 15 s at 60°C, followed by the application of disinfectant (Virkon S in this study) or (b) the use of ultrasound (4 kW) at 65°C for 3 to 6 min, with or without mechanical brushing of crates.

5. Both of these treatments also achieved a 4 log10 reduction or more in the counts of Enterobacteriaceae but were less effective in reducing aerobic plate counts.

6. It was noted that there was little correlation between the visual assessment of crate cleanliness and microbiological counts.

7. It was concluded that the demonstrated enhanced cleaning could contribute significantly to overall hygiene control in poultry meat production.

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper formed part of a project funded by the UK Food Standards Agency. The authors are indebted to the management and technical staff of the poultry companies who collaborated in this research and to PLC Ltd for their advice and loan of the ultrasonic equipment.

Notes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.