29
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Egg Shell Strength

2. The relationship between egg specific gravity and egg shell deformation and their reliability as indicators of shell strength

Pages 193-199 | Received 23 Nov 1966, Published online: 08 Nov 2007
 

Synopsis

Three experiments are reported which were designed to measure the relationship that exists between the specific gravity of an egg and deformation of its shell under load and also to determine the extent to which these two egg characteristics are related to shell breakage in the field.

A very close relationship was shown to exist between egg specific gravity and egg shell deformation.

In experiments 1 and 2, measurements of specific gravity and shell deformation were performed upon samples of eggs produced by groups of birds housed in wire‐floored pens and by individual birds kept in battery cages and were found, with one exception, to be significantly related to the incidence of cracking under these field conditions. The one non‐significant correlation was that between egg shell deformation and percentage cracks among eggs from the various pens of birds. However, too much emphasis should not be placed on this latter result because the incidence of floor‐laying in the different pens was not uniform and this increased chance variation in the occurrence of cracking.

In experiment 3 specific gravities and shell deformations were determined on 3000 sound eggs before they were subjected to treatments that simulated the hazards encountered during (a) laying in battery cages, (b) transport in the conventional travelling boxes. Both measurements were found to forecast fairly accurately the probability of a particular egg becoming cracked or remaining sound during the treatments.

The results confirm that egg specific gravity, as measured by the hydrometer method, is a reliable assessment of shell strength and suggest that the measurement of shell deformation is of comparable reliability. Other factors of practical significance that would influence the choice between the two assessments are discussed.

Notes

Present address: B.E.M.B. Experimental Unit, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.