![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
Synopsis
An analysis was performed on the published results of the first, second and third Gosford Random Sample Tests to determine which of the various biological traits reported had the greatest influence upon the overall ranking. Ten traits were considered. It was found that regression on survivors’ average egg production and laying house mortality removed 88.1 per cent of the variation in financial return. The addition of average egg weight and daily food consumption increased this figure to 93.3 per cent. The remaining traits, number of unsaleable birds at 500 days, body weight at 500 days, age at 50 per cent production, blood spots, meat spots and shell thickness, did not produce significant reductions except in so far as they were correlated with those previously mentioned.
The financial returns expected from improvements in the four important traits were:
-
Per bird
-
+ 12 in survivors egg production 2S. 4¼d. ± 1¼d.
-
—5 in percentage laying mortality is. 5d.± 1d.
-
+ 1 g. in average egg weight 10½d. + 1 ½d.
-
—5 g. in food consumed per day 43/4d.± 1¼d.
Laying house mortality was found to be positively correlated among the entries with survivors’ average egg production and with average egg weight.