22
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Hatchery hygiene evaluation as measured by microbiological examination of samples of fluff

, &
Pages 297-310 | Received 10 Apr 1966, Published online: 08 Nov 2007
 

Synopsis

The microbial content of 1,180 samples of fluff from hatchers at 18 chick and 6 turkey hatcheries has been determined. The samples were taken (a) 12–15 hr before removal of birds from the hatchers, (b) just before or after theremoval of chicks orpoults, (c) after fumigation and (d) inreplicate from the same hatcher.

Fifty‐eight per cent of the samples of chick fluff contained one million or more bacteria but only 24 per cent contained more than 100,000 coli‐aerogenes bacteria. Moulds were not found in 68 per cent of the samples. Some samples of fluff were examined for coagulase positive staphylococci and fluorescent pseudomonads but these organisms were generally not detected. Bacillus cereus was recovered in very large numbers from a few samples. Bacterial and coli‐aerogenes counts from poult fluff were generally higher than those from chick fluff but the numbers of pseudomonads and coagulase positive staphylococci recovered were generally negligible.

In an intensive study of samples of fluff from one turkey hatchery, it was found that the level of contamination of fluff increased during hatching and the laying season and was accompanied by a decrease in poult quality. Sampling from any location in the hatcher appears to provide a representative indication of overall contamination at that time. Fumigation of fluff and debris generally caused a reduction in the level of contamination in the fluff.

A suggested assessment of hatchery hygiene based on the microbial examination of fluff is given and the advantages and disadvantages of this method are discussed.

Notes

Mrs J. Mason.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.