1,195
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Behaviour, Welfare & Environment

Prevalence of nematode infection and faecal egg counts in free-range laying hens: relations to housing and husbandry

, , , , , & show all
Pages 12-23 | Accepted 07 Sep 2012, Published online: 28 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

1. Faecal samples from 19 commercial, 65 week old free-range egg laying flocks were examined to assess the prevalence and number of parasitic nematode eggs. Data were collected to characterise the housing, husbandry, behaviour and welfare of the flocks to examine possible relationships with the egg counts.

2. Eggs of at least one genus of nematode were present in the faeces of all 19 flocks. Heterakis eggs were detected in 17 (89%) flocks, Ascaridia in 16 (84%), Trichostrongylus in 9 (47%), and Syngamus in 6 (32%). Faecal egg counts (FEC) were greatest for Ascaridia and Heterakis.

3. For each nematode genus, there was no significant difference in FEC between organic (N = 9) and non-organic (N = 10) flocks, or between static (N = 8) and mobile (N = 11) flocks.

4. FEC were correlated with a range of housing, husbandry and management practices which varied between the nematode genus and included depth of the litter, percentage of hens using the range, and number of dead hens. Statistical analysis indicated relationships with FEC that included light intensity above the feeder, indoor and outdoor stocking density, fearfulness in the shed and on the range, distance to the nearest shelter, and swollen toes.

5. None of the FEC for any of the genera was correlated with weekly egg production or cumulative mortality.

6. Although nematode FEC were highly prevalent among the flocks, the overall lack of relation to other welfare and production measures suggests that these infections were not severe.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the RSPCA. Most of the flocks were recruited with the kind assistance of Noble Foods and Stonegate and we gratefully acknowledge their enormous contribution, that of their producers and all other independent producers and farm staff who participated so willingly, enthusiastically and professionally in this study. We thank Prof. Christine Nicol for helpful advice and comments at all stages of this study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.