204
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Genetics

Using random regression models to estimate genetic variation in growth pattern and its association with sexual maturity of Thai native chickens

, , , , , & show all
Pages 615-623 | Received 25 Feb 2020, Accepted 14 May 2020, Published online: 14 Aug 2020
 

ABSTRACT

1. Genetic (co)variances and parameters between body weights (BW) across the growth trajectory were estimated using a univariate random regression (RR) animal model. The effect of growth rates (GH) on age at first egg (AFE) and egg weight at first egg (EWFE) were explored using a series of univariate and bivariate analyses.

2. Body weights were taken from Thai native chickens at hatch day to 168 days of age. The model included interactions between age with hatch nested within year and sex as fixed effects, and random effects of direct additive genetic, direct permanent environmental, maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects. All random effects were fitted as regressions to animals’ age via quadratic Legendre polynomials and fitting six classes of residual variances was identified as an optimal variance structure to estimate parameters.

3. Genetic and phenotypic variances for BW increased with increasing age. Estimated heritabilities for direct additive (h2a) and maternal genetic (h2 m) effects on BW traits ranged from 0.34 to 0.54, and 0.04 to 0.06, respectively. Estimated variance ratios for direct (c2ape) and maternal permanent environmental (c2 mpe) effects ranged from 0.19 to 0.48 and 0.10 to 0.12, respectively. Estimated correlations between weights at different ages were high for all random effects.

4. Estimated h2a for six GH traits ranged from 0.06 to 0.28, while for AFE and EWFE these were 0.24 and 0.16, respectively. Estimated h2 m and c2 mpe were low for GH. Estimated genetic correlations between GH and AFE ranged from −0.22 to 0.02 and, between GH and EWFE, ranged from −0.05 to 0.40. These estimates suggested that selecting high GH chickens at 28 days of age can be expected to reduce AFE and to increase EWFE.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank staff members of Kabinburi Livestock Research and Breeding Centre, Department of Livestock Development in Thailand for conduction and data collection. Also, we thank the Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization), ARDA, of Thailand for financial supporting the PhD study of Ms Siriporn Tongsiri.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.