Response of laying hens to asymmetrical interrupted lighting regimens: Reproductive performance, body weight and carcase composition

Abstract

1. The performance of brown egg laying hens was compared under conventional and asymmetrical interrupted‐lighting conditions.

2. Egg numbers and mean weight were similar under the two conditions, provided the apparent day perceived by the hen was the same under both lighting treatments.

3. Daily food intakes of intermittently‐illuminated hens were not significantly lower than those of conventionally‐lit birds. However, the reductions were of the magnitude reported in the literature and observed under commercial conditions.

4. Shell quality was unaffected by interrupted lighting in the period up to 60 weeks of age in two of the 4 genotypes studied. All breeds had lower shell weights under interrupted lighting in the last three months of lay.

5. Intermittently‐lit hens had lower body weights, which approached significance, and significantly less carcase fat. There were no differences in ash, protein (N x 6.25) or water contents of the carcases, or in fat content at a given body weight.

6. There were no significant differences in the production responses of the 4 brown‐egg hybrids to interrupted lighting.

7. Diets with differing concentrations of energy and protein were included in both trials, but there was no evidence of interaction between these nutritional treatments and the lighting treatments.