![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
1. The effects of constant photoperiods and of single (5 h) changes in photoperiod applied at 12 or 17 weeks of age upon age at first egg (AFE) were studied using ISA Brown and Shaver 288 pullets.
2. Birds reared from 2 d of age until after maturity on constant 10 h photoperiods matured 8 d earlier than birds reared on constant 8 h and 5 d earlier than the average for 13 or 18 h photoperiods.
3. A single increment in photoperiod from 8 to 13 h advanced AFE by 23 d (compared to 8 h constant day controls) when applied at 84 d, but by only 6 d when given at 119 d. An increase in photoperiod from 13 to 18 h advanced AFE by only 4 d, averaged across breeds and age at increase. A reduction in photoperiod from 13 to 8 h delayed AFE by 22 d when given at 84 d and by 16 d at 119 d. A similar 5 h reduction in photoperiod, but from 18 to 13 h, retarded maturity by 11 d in ISA Brown pullets, but only when given at 84 d, and delayed AFE in Shaver 288 by 12 d, but only when given at 119 d. This interaction may be partly explained by the different physiological stages reached by the two breeds when the photoperiod was changed.
4. Under constant daylengths cumulative food intake before first egg was positively correlated with photoperiod, but the early AFE for birds on 10 h photoperiods resulted in this group having the lowest cumulative food intake to first egg.
5. A 5 h increase in photoperiod at 84 d significantly reduced the food consumed to first egg, but had no effect when given at 119 d. A 5 h decrease in photoperiod generally increased the food consumed to first egg, but the effect was only significant when the daylength was reduced from 13 to 8 h at 119 d. Food intake to first egg in birds subjected to a change in photoperiod was highly correlated with AFE.
6. The data confirm that sexual development in growing pullets responds more to changes in photoperiod than to the absolute daylength, that changes made at different daylengths are not equivalent and that sensitivity changes with age.
