Publication Cover
Caryologia
International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics
Volume 57, 2004 - Issue 1
206
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An undescribed karyotype for Thaptomys (2n = 50) and the mechanism of differentiation from Thaptomys nigrita (2n = 52) evidenced by FISH and Ag-NORs

, , , &
Pages 89-97 | Received 30 Apr 2003, Accepted 20 Sep 2003, Published online: 18 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

Thaptomys nigrita is a monotypic species with 2n = 52 from Akodontini tribe. The karyotype is composed by 25 pairs of autosome being 24 acrocentric decreasing in size and a small metacentric pair. X and Y are respectively a medium size acrocentric and a small submetacentric.

In this paper we report for the first time a karyotype with 2n = 50 for an undescribed species of genus Thaptomys. This new karyotype is encompasses by 24 pairs of acrocentric autosomes decreasing in size; X and Y chromosomes are respectively a large acrocentric and a small submetacentric; heterochromatic blocks are observed in the pericentromeric regions of all autosomes and of the X, whereas the long arm of the Y is entirely heterochromatic. Multiple Ag-NORs are located at the telomeric regions of the long arm of the autosomes, and a single chromosome pair (24) presents Ag-NORs in both telomeric regions, which is similar to the pattern observed in the metacentric autosome pair 25 of Thaptomys nigrita with 2n = 52. It can be suggested that this pair 24 has undergone a pericentric inversion and originated the acrocentric pair in Thaptomys sp. with 2n = 50.

G-banding pattern and interstitial telomeric signal (ITS) by FISH suggest that the karyotype differentiation between both karyomorphs with 2n = 52 in Thaptomys nigrita and 2n = 50 of Thaptomys sp. was due to a tandem fusion involving respectively pairs 2 and 24 from the former resulting in pair 2 of the latter. We propose that this new karyotype with 2n = 50 belongs to a new and cryptic species for the genus Thaptomys, since these two entities seem to be morphologically indistinguishable and the geographic localization plus the chromosome rearrangements can represent a reproductive barrier between these two forms.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.